CaseMark vs Litify: pricing, features and which to choose

Plans, prices, deployment options, strengths and limits for CaseMark vs Litify, taken from each company's pricing page, docs and changelog. Updated October 2026.

CaseMarkLitify
CaseMark logo

CaseMark

Legal AI Tools

CaseMark makes Para, an AI colleague for law firms that takes work by email, Teams, Slack or a web app and returns finished documents such as demand letters, memos and motion drafts. It also sells structured legal summaries of depositions, transcripts and medical records with page-level citations. Para costs $20 or $100 per seat a month, and summaries cost $25 each.

Litify logo

Litify

Legal AI Tools

Litify is a legal operating platform built on Salesforce for law firms, corporate legal departments, government agencies and nonprofits. It handles intake, matters, documents, billing and reporting, and its Litify ACE agent and LitifyAI tools summarize cases, draft documents, build medical chronologies and generate demand letters. Salesforce AppExchange lists pricing from $200 per user a month.

Quick comparison

FeatureCaseMarkLitify
CategoryLegal AI ToolsLegal AI Tools
Main useLegal summariesLegal case management
Pricing modelPay per usePaid only
Free plan No No
Entry paid plan$20/seat/month (Para Standard)From $200/user/month (Litify platform)
PlatformsWeb, email, SlackWeb and mobile
Open source No No
Self-hosted No No
Public API Yes Yes
Profile updatedOctober 2026October 2026

Pricing plans

Every public plan, as listed on each company's pricing page.

CaseMark

  • Para Standard$20/seat/month

    Seat fee credited to usage wallet; projects, automations, skills, meetings.

  • Para Pro$100/seat/month

    Legal and medical grade protections, top reasoning, BAA on annual plans.

  • Legal summaries$25/summary

    Pay as you go; deposition, transcript and contract summaries.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Firm-wide setup; usage covered by agreement.

Litify

  • Litify platformFrom $200/user/month

    Per Salesforce AppExchange; modules and AI quoted separately.

  • Enterprise legal managementCustom

    Corporate legal intake, matters, documents and eBilling.

  • NonprofitDiscounted

    Discounts listed for nonprofit legal organizations.

Strengths and limits

CaseMark

  • Summaries from $25 with no subscription.
  • Page-level citations to the transcript.
  • Para works in email, Teams and Slack.
  • White label options for court reporters.
  • No built-in case management.
  • Some summary rates differ across pages.
  • Smaller vendor than major legal platforms.

Litify

  • Built on Salesforce security and tools.
  • Intake to billing in one platform.
  • Litify ACE runs multi-step case agents.
  • Medical chronologies and instant demands.
  • Starts at $200 per user a month.
  • Implementation takes time and partners.
  • Deep changes need Salesforce skills.

Which should you choose?

Choose CaseMark if

  • Litigators summarizing depositions.
  • Personal injury firms reviewing medical records.
  • Court reporters reselling summaries.
  • Small firms wanting low-cost legal AI.

Look elsewhere if

  • Firms needing full case management.
  • Teams wanting legal research databases.
  • Users who need fixed published rates for every service.

Choose Litify if

  • Personal injury and mass tort firms.
  • Firms already using Salesforce.
  • Corporate legal departments managing spend.
  • Firms wanting AI agents on every matter.

Look elsewhere if

  • Solo lawyers on tight budgets.
  • Firms wanting self-serve setup.
  • Teams needing only legal research.

CaseMark logo CaseMark in brief

CaseMark builds AI for litigation teams, court reporters and litigation support companies. It first became known for AI deposition summaries, and its main product is now Para, which it describes as an AI colleague for legal teams; Para was formerly called CaseMark Operator. Its users include personal injury and commercial litigation firms, paralegals, legal nurse consultants and court reporting agencies that resell summaries under their own brand. CaseMark says it is SOC 2 Type II audited and HIPAA compliant, encrypts data with AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.2 in transit, and does not use customer data to train models on its Pro and Enterprise plans.

Para takes requests in email, Microsoft Teams, Slack, meetings and its web app, and it records meetings on Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Webex. It connects to Clio, Smokeball, Google Drive and Microsoft 365 for documents. Teams assign it work such as reviewing medical records, drafting demand letters, writing motions for summary judgment or preparing deposition bundles, and Para keeps working after hours, then reports back with drafts and questions. CaseMark says Para checks with an attorney before anything leaves the firm and that work going to a court or client goes out under an attorney's name. Projects, automations, skills and meetings are included on every plan.

CaseMark's strengths are low entry prices, pay-per-file summaries with no subscription, page-level citations, multiple deposition formats, white label options for court reporters and Para's ability to work in email and chat tools lawyers already use. Its weaknesses are a smaller company than the major legal platforms, no case management of its own and inconsistent published rates for some summary types. Filevine and Litify include deposition and medical AI inside full case management. EvenUp and Supio focus on personal injury demands and case analysis. CoCounsel and Harvey offer broad legal AI for research and drafting. Choose CaseMark if you want affordable, cited summaries or an AI colleague without changing systems.

Read the full CaseMark review

Litify logo Litify in brief

Litify was founded in 2016 by John Morgan, of the personal injury firm Morgan & Morgan, and Reuven Moskowitz, and Morgan & Morgan became one of its largest customers after migrating millions of client and case files. Bessemer Venture Partners took a majority stake in 2023. Litify says it serves more than 45,000 legal professionals, including Salesforce itself, plaintiff and defense firms, in-house legal teams, government agencies and nonprofits. Because it runs on Salesforce, firms get Salesforce's security, mobile apps, reporting and integrations, and can extend Litify with other Salesforce apps. In March 2026 Litify rebranded its product as an AI-native Platform of Action.

Litify covers the full case lifecycle. Intake tools capture leads, qualify them and send retainers for e-signature. Matter management tracks parties, deadlines, tasks, notes, emails and files, with configurable workflows for each practice area. Document management and generation, timekeeping, billing and eBilling, and real-time reports and dashboards are included, all configured in a no-code environment. For corporate legal departments, Litify offers enterprise legal management with matter intake, outside counsel spend control and eBilling. Litify says its platform runs on Salesforce and AWS, with Anthropic as its closed AI model provider. Implementation is a project, often with partners, rather than a self-serve signup.

Litify's strengths are its Salesforce foundation, end-to-end coverage from intake to billing, a growing library of native AI agents, strong personal injury features and support for corporate legal departments. Its weaknesses are a high starting price, implementation effort, dependence on Salesforce skills for deep customization and limited public pricing. Filevine offers similar configurable case management with LOIS AI and deposition tools. Clio suits smaller firms wanting simpler setup. EvenUp and Supio focus on AI for injury demands and case analysis. Eve targets plaintiff firms with AI-native workflows. Choose Litify if your firm wants a Salesforce-based platform with AI agents across every case.

Read the full Litify review

Frequently asked questions

How do CaseMark vs Litify compare on price?

CaseMark has no free plan, and its first paid plan (Para Standard) is listed at $20/seat/month. Litify has no free plan, and its first paid plan (Litify platform) is listed at From $200/user/month. Prices are from each company's pricing page and can change, so check before you buy.

Which has a free plan, CaseMark vs Litify?

None of them has a permanent free plan. CaseMark starts at $20/seat/month. Litify starts at From $200/user/month.

Can I self-host or integrate CaseMark vs Litify?

None of them is open source. All of them run as hosted services only. CaseMark and Litify offer a public API.

How much does CaseMark cost?

Para, CaseMark's AI colleague, costs $20 per seat a month on Standard and $100 on Pro, with each seat fee credited to a usage wallet. Structured legal summaries are pay as you go at $25 each. Medical summaries and transcription are priced by size, and Enterprise is priced by agreement.

What is CaseMark Para?

Para is CaseMark's AI colleague for legal teams, formerly called CaseMark Operator. You assign work by email, Teams, Slack, meetings or the web app, and Para returns finished documents such as demand letters, memos and motion drafts. It connects to Clio, Smokeball, Google Drive and Microsoft 365 and checks with an attorney before sending.

How much does Litify cost?

Litify's Salesforce AppExchange listing shows pricing starting at $200 per user a month, with discounts for nonprofits. Final pricing depends on the modules chosen, user count, Salesforce licensing and implementation services, and AI features are packaged by Litify's sales team. There is no free plan or self-serve trial.

What is Litify ACE?

Litify ACE, the Agentic Case Expert, is Litify's AI agent layer, launched in March 2026 and expanded in ACE 2.0. It understands each matter's data and documents and runs multi-step workflows such as qualifying intakes, scoring client sentiment, finding unused insurance coverage, drafting interrogatory responses and preparing deposition summaries.

Related comparisons

Sources