CaseMark vs EvenUp: pricing, features and which to choose

CaseMark builds AI for litigation teams, court reporters and litigation support companies. It first became known for AI deposition summaries, and its main product is now Para, which it describes as an AI colleague for legal teams; Para was formerly called CaseMark Operator. Its users include personal injury and commercial litigation firms, paralegals, legal nurse consultants and court reporting agencies that resell summaries under their own brand. CaseMark says it is SOC 2 Type II audited and HIPAA compliant, encrypts data with AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.2 in transit, and does not use customer data to train models on its Pro and Enterprise plans.

Para takes requests in email, Microsoft Teams, Slack, meetings and its web app, and it records meetings on Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Webex. It connects to Clio, Smokeball, Google Drive and Microsoft 365 for documents. Teams assign it work such as reviewing medical records, drafting demand letters, writing motions for summary judgment or preparing deposition bundles, and Para keeps working after hours, then reports back with drafts and questions. CaseMark says Para checks with an attorney before anything leaves the firm and that work going to a court or client goes out under an attorney's name. Projects, automations, skills and meetings are included on every plan.

CaseMark's strengths are low entry prices, pay-per-file summaries with no subscription, page-level citations, multiple deposition formats, white label options for court reporters and Para's ability to work in email and chat tools lawyers already use. Its weaknesses are a smaller company than the major legal platforms, no case management of its own and inconsistent published rates for some summary types. Filevine and Litify include deposition and medical AI inside full case management. EvenUp and Supio focus on personal injury demands and case analysis. CoCounsel and Harvey offer broad legal AI for research and drafting. Choose CaseMark if you want affordable, cited summaries or an AI colleague without changing systems.

Founded in 2019 by Rami Karabibar, Raymond Mieszaniec, and Saam Mashhad, EvenUp develops software for plaintiff-side personal injury practices. The company announced a $150 million Series E in October 2025, bringing reported funding to $385 million and its valuation above $2 billion. EvenUp says more than 2,000 firms use its platform, including 20 percent of the Top 100 United States personal injury firms. It also says customers have resolved more than 200,000 cases representing over $10 billion in damages. The company remains headquartered in San Francisco. Its focused design suits personal injury teams handling substantial medical documentation, but it offers less value to general commercial practices seeking broad legal research, transactional drafting, or unrelated case-management workflows.

A matter can begin with medical records, bills, correspondence, and other documents uploaded to the platform. Piai extracts treatment details, organizes provider information into a timeline, and identifies liability, damages, and missing material. Teams can create demand letters, medical summaries, complaints, negotiation sheets, interrogatory responses, and related drafts. Express Demands can assemble exhibits and retain line-level references. Firms can choose AI-generated work or a professional review option involving EvenUp legal professionals. Smart Workflows flags treatment gaps, missing documents, and timing issues. Case Financials and Medical Bill Summary help staff examine charges against policy limits. Attorneys remain responsible for verifying facts, revising documents, and making legal decisions before using any output.

EvenUp's main drawback is commercial opacity. The company describes its products and case-based model, but does not publish plan prices, public usage quotas, a self-serve API, or a standard trial. Eve is a close personal injury competitor with intake, case evaluation, drafting, and litigation workflows. Supio focuses on medical-record analysis, chronologies, and plaintiff case documents. DigitalOwl concentrates on structured medical-record review rather than a complete demand workflow. EvenUp is a strong fit for a personal injury firm seeking medical analysis, demands, financial review, and task alerts from one vendor. It is less suitable for buyers requiring published rates, broad legal research, or autonomous work without attorney checking.