CaseMark Review, Pricing & Alternatives (2026)

CaseMark builds AI for litigation teams, court reporters and litigation support companies. It first became known for AI deposition summaries, and its main product is now Para, which it describes as an AI colleague for legal teams; Para was formerly called CaseMark Operator. Its users include personal injury and commercial litigation firms, paralegals, legal nurse consultants and court reporting agencies that resell summaries under their own brand. CaseMark says it is SOC 2 Type II audited and HIPAA compliant, encrypts data with AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.2 in transit, and does not use customer data to train models on its Pro and Enterprise plans.

Para takes requests in email, Microsoft Teams, Slack, meetings and its web app, and it records meetings on Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Webex. It connects to Clio, Smokeball, Google Drive and Microsoft 365 for documents. Teams assign it work such as reviewing medical records, drafting demand letters, writing motions for summary judgment or preparing deposition bundles, and Para keeps working after hours, then reports back with drafts and questions. CaseMark says Para checks with an attorney before anything leaves the firm and that work going to a court or client goes out under an attorney's name. Projects, automations, skills and meetings are included on every plan.

CaseMark's structured summaries turn depositions, trial transcripts, pleadings, contracts and medical records into citation-rich deliverables. Deposition formats include a Deposition Analysis Summary with credibility analysis, admissions and chronology, a neutral Deposition Index of up to 13 sections for court reporters, page-line summaries and narrative summaries. CaseMark says a 200-page transcript becomes a summary in under two minutes, with every finding linked to its page. Insight Pass asks framing questions about audience, side and purpose before drafting. After delivery, users can interrogate the summary and full transcript with grounded AI questions. Outputs come as editable Word files or hyperlinked PDFs, and summaries can run in bulk through an API.

Para Standard costs $20 per seat a month and Pro costs $100 per seat a month, and each seat fee is credited to a usage wallet, so usage is included up to that amount and extra usage is billed at cost. Pro adds medical and legal grade data protections, CaseMark's most capable reasoning, direct support and a BAA on annual plans. Enterprise is priced by agreement. Structured summaries are pay as you go with no platform fee: legal summaries cost $25 each, while medical summaries and transcription are priced by page count or length, and CaseMark's pages list different rates for these, so buyers should confirm the current price. Source is a branded offering for court reporters.

CaseMark's strengths are low entry prices, pay-per-file summaries with no subscription, page-level citations, multiple deposition formats, white label options for court reporters and Para's ability to work in email and chat tools lawyers already use. Its weaknesses are a smaller company than the major legal platforms, no case management of its own and inconsistent published rates for some summary types. Filevine and Litify include deposition and medical AI inside full case management. EvenUp and Supio focus on personal injury demands and case analysis. CoCounsel and Harvey offer broad legal AI for research and drafting. Choose CaseMark if you want affordable, cited summaries or an AI colleague without changing systems.