CaseMark vs Supio: pricing, features and which to choose

Plans, prices, deployment options, strengths and limits for CaseMark vs Supio, taken from each company's pricing page, docs and changelog. Updated October 2026.

CaseMarkSupio
CaseMark logo

CaseMark

Legal AI Tools

CaseMark makes Para, an AI colleague for law firms that takes work by email, Teams, Slack or a web app and returns finished documents such as demand letters, memos and motion drafts. It also sells structured legal summaries of depositions, transcripts and medical records with page-level citations. Para costs $20 or $100 per seat a month, and summaries cost $25 each.

Supio logo

Supio

Legal AI Tools

Supio is a hosted legal AI platform for plaintiff-side personal injury and mass-tort firms. It combines document intelligence, intake, drafting, case economics, and agentic workflows, with APIs and CMS connectors for customer applications. Supio publishes no dollar prices. Its entry point is a custom Case Subscription or Unlimited Firm Access quote.

Quick comparison

FeatureCaseMarkSupio
CategoryLegal AI ToolsLegal AI Tools
Main useLegal summariesPlaintiff casework
Pricing modelPay per usePaid only
Free plan No No
Entry paid plan$20/seat/month (Para Standard)Custom (Case Subscription)
PlatformsWeb, email, SlackWeb and API
Open source No No
Self-hosted No No
Public API Yes Yes
Profile updatedOctober 2026October 2026

Pricing plans

Every public plan, as listed on each company's pricing page.

CaseMark

  • Para Standard$20/seat/month

    Seat fee credited to usage wallet; projects, automations, skills, meetings.

  • Para Pro$100/seat/month

    Legal and medical grade protections, top reasoning, BAA on annual plans.

  • Legal summaries$25/summary

    Pay as you go; deposition, transcript and contract summaries.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Firm-wide setup; usage covered by agreement.

Supio

  • Case SubscriptionCustom

    Unlimited usage, users, and pages are published. Exact price, minimum volume, and entitlements are not published.

  • Unlimited Firm AccessCustom

    Unlimited cases, usage, users, and pages are published. Exact quote, minimum volume, and other limits are not published.

Strengths and limits

CaseMark

  • Summaries from $25 with no subscription.
  • Page-level citations to the transcript.
  • Para works in email, Teams and Slack.
  • White label options for court reporters.
  • No built-in case management.
  • Some summary rates differ across pages.
  • Smaller vendor than major legal platforms.

Supio

  • Supio targets personal injury and mass tort workflows directly.
  • Both published access options include unlimited users and pages.
  • Supio Agent adds attorney supervised case and portfolio automation.
  • Developer APIs and CMS connectors support custom workflows.
  • Supio does not publish dollar prices for either access option.
  • The company does not name its underlying foundation model vendors.
  • Supio does not publish API quotas or retention schedules.

Which should you choose?

Choose CaseMark if

  • Litigators summarizing depositions.
  • Personal injury firms reviewing medical records.
  • Court reporters reselling summaries.
  • Small firms wanting low-cost legal AI.

Look elsewhere if

  • Firms needing full case management.
  • Teams wanting legal research databases.
  • Users who need fixed published rates for every service.

Choose Supio if

  • Plaintiff firms managing personal injury case documents.
  • Mass tort teams handling high volume case portfolios.
  • Firms needing AI intake linked to case management systems.
  • Teams seeking custom API and CMS integrations.

Look elsewhere if

  • Solo users seeking a public self serve price.
  • Teams requiring self hosted or on premises deployment.
  • Buyers needing named foundation models and published API quotas.

CaseMark logo CaseMark in brief

CaseMark builds AI for litigation teams, court reporters and litigation support companies. It first became known for AI deposition summaries, and its main product is now Para, which it describes as an AI colleague for legal teams; Para was formerly called CaseMark Operator. Its users include personal injury and commercial litigation firms, paralegals, legal nurse consultants and court reporting agencies that resell summaries under their own brand. CaseMark says it is SOC 2 Type II audited and HIPAA compliant, encrypts data with AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.2 in transit, and does not use customer data to train models on its Pro and Enterprise plans.

Para takes requests in email, Microsoft Teams, Slack, meetings and its web app, and it records meetings on Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Webex. It connects to Clio, Smokeball, Google Drive and Microsoft 365 for documents. Teams assign it work such as reviewing medical records, drafting demand letters, writing motions for summary judgment or preparing deposition bundles, and Para keeps working after hours, then reports back with drafts and questions. CaseMark says Para checks with an attorney before anything leaves the firm and that work going to a court or client goes out under an attorney's name. Projects, automations, skills and meetings are included on every plan.

CaseMark's strengths are low entry prices, pay-per-file summaries with no subscription, page-level citations, multiple deposition formats, white label options for court reporters and Para's ability to work in email and chat tools lawyers already use. Its weaknesses are a smaller company than the major legal platforms, no case management of its own and inconsistent published rates for some summary types. Filevine and Litify include deposition and medical AI inside full case management. EvenUp and Supio focus on personal injury demands and case analysis. CoCounsel and Harvey offer broad legal AI for research and drafting. Choose CaseMark if you want affordable, cited summaries or an AI colleague without changing systems.

Read the full CaseMark review

Supio logo Supio in brief

Supio is a Seattle legal AI company focused on personal injury and mass tort plaintiff firms. It emerged from stealth in August 2024 with a $25 million Series A, then announced a $60 million Series B on April 30, 2025, bringing reported total funding to $91 million. Sapphire Ventures led the Series B, with Mayfield and Thomson Reuters Ventures participating. Supio is built for firms processing substantial case records and portfolios, rather than for general legal question answering. Its named workflows include chronologies, demand letters, case ledgers, litigation drafting, intake, and agentic case operations. The company describes specialized, purpose-built AI models and human expert verification, but does not name the foundation model vendors behind the service.

Supio organizes case preparation around document intelligence and structured outputs. Case Economics, Case Signals, and the Drafting Suite address different stages of reviewing records and producing work product. Teams can create chronologies, demand letters, case ledgers, and litigation drafts. Supio Intake conducts intake around the clock, scores leads, and writes structured case data to a case-management system. Supio Agent, launched in May 2026, plans and executes finished work with attorney oversight at case, portfolio, and firm levels. Connectors support integrations and two-way CMS synchronization, while a Westlaw Advantage connection was announced in April 2026. The practical design is a shared operating layer for case preparation, lead handling, and drafting, rather than a single document-generation utility.

The main buying risk is opacity around commercial and technical details. Supio does not publish dollar prices, named model vendors, API limits, retention schedules, or self-hosted deployment options. EvenUp is the closest specialist comparison, covering plaintiff-injury intake, treatment, demands, negotiation, discovery, and trial, with MedChrons combining AI and professional or nurse review. Filevine’s LOIS is broader case-management software that acts on matters, deadlines, documents, and appointments inside its system of record. Litify combines Salesforce-based practice management with agentic workflows and a Supio-powered damages assistant. Supio should be picked by plaintiff firms wanting dedicated case intelligence, intake, drafting, and portfolio automation, provided a custom quote and contract answer their integration and governance requirements.

Read the full Supio review

Frequently asked questions

How do CaseMark vs Supio compare on price?

CaseMark has no free plan, and its first paid plan (Para Standard) is listed at $20/seat/month. Supio has no free plan, and its first paid plan (Case Subscription) is listed at Custom. Prices are from each company's pricing page and can change, so check before you buy.

Which has a free plan, CaseMark vs Supio?

None of them has a permanent free plan. CaseMark starts at $20/seat/month. Supio starts at Custom.

Can I self-host or integrate CaseMark vs Supio?

None of them is open source. All of them run as hosted services only. CaseMark and Supio offer a public API.

How much does CaseMark cost?

Para, CaseMark's AI colleague, costs $20 per seat a month on Standard and $100 on Pro, with each seat fee credited to a usage wallet. Structured legal summaries are pay as you go at $25 each. Medical summaries and transcription are priced by size, and Enterprise is priced by agreement.

What is CaseMark Para?

Para is CaseMark's AI colleague for legal teams, formerly called CaseMark Operator. You assign work by email, Teams, Slack, meetings or the web app, and Para returns finished documents such as demand letters, memos and motion drafts. It connects to Clio, Smokeball, Google Drive and Microsoft 365 and checks with an attorney before sending.

How much does Supio cost?

Supio does not publish dollar prices. Its pricing page describes Case Subscription for larger firms seeking predictable per case costs and Unlimited Firm Access for unlimited cases, users, and pages. Both are custom commercial options with no published platform fees or lock in contracts. Exact quotes, minimum volumes, pilot terms, and overage rules are not publicly specified.

Does Supio have a free plan or trial?

Supio does not publish a free plan or self serve trial. Its pricing materials say a pilot may begin with a handful of cases, but they do not state whether the pilot is free, how long it lasts, or what limits apply. Prospective customers therefore need a firm specific commercial discussion before knowing the pilot cost and scope.

Related comparisons

Sources