Eve vs Litify: pricing, features and which to choose

Plans, prices, deployment options, strengths and limits for Eve vs Litify, taken from each company's pricing page, docs and changelog. Updated October 2026.

EveLitify
Eve logo

Eve

Legal AI Tools

EveOS is hosted legal AI software for plaintiff-side firms, especially personal injury, employment, and mass-tort practices. It combines intake, case operations, document analysis, drafting, and agentic workflows. Eve publishes no platform dollar price or self-serve plan, so firms enter through a custom contract and sales call rather than a public monthly subscription.

Litify logo

Litify

Legal AI Tools

Litify is a legal operating platform built on Salesforce for law firms, corporate legal departments, government agencies and nonprofits. It handles intake, matters, documents, billing and reporting, and its Litify ACE agent and LitifyAI tools summarize cases, draft documents, build medical chronologies and generate demand letters. Salesforce AppExchange lists pricing from $200 per user a month.

Quick comparison

FeatureEveLitify
CategoryLegal AI ToolsLegal AI Tools
Main usePlaintiff legal AILegal case management
Pricing modelPaid onlyPaid only
Free plan No No
Entry paid planCustom (Custom contract)From $200/user/month (Litify platform)
PlatformsWeb cloudWeb and mobile
Open source No No
Self-hosted No No
Public API No Yes
Profile updatedOctober 2026October 2026

Pricing plans

Every public plan, as listed on each company's pricing page.

Eve

  • Custom contractCustom

    Private Orders set rates and entitlements. Matters, pages, leads, and voice minutes may be metered, with monthly overage true-ups.

Litify

  • Litify platformFrom $200/user/month

    Per Salesforce AppExchange; modules and AI quoted separately.

  • Enterprise legal managementCustom

    Corporate legal intake, matters, documents and eBilling.

  • NonprofitDiscounted

    Discounts listed for nonprofit legal organizations.

Strengths and limits

Eve

  • EveOS targets plaintiff-side case and firm operations directly.
  • Reasoning Mode supports litigation-document analysis.
  • AI Workforce adds Agents, Auditors, and Analysts.
  • The company says customer content does not train central models.
  • Eve publishes no platform dollar price or self-serve plan.
  • Several usage categories are metered under private Orders.
  • No public developer documentation or self-hosted option is identified.

Litify

  • Built on Salesforce security and tools.
  • Intake to billing in one platform.
  • Litify ACE runs multi-step case agents.
  • Medical chronologies and instant demands.
  • Starts at $200 per user a month.
  • Implementation takes time and partners.
  • Deep changes need Salesforce skills.

Which should you choose?

Choose Eve if

  • Plaintiff firms handling personal injury, employment, or mass-tort matters.
  • Teams needing intake, document analysis, drafting, and case workflows.
  • Firms comfortable buying hosted software through a custom contract.
  • Organizations requiring SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA compliance claims.

Look elsewhere if

  • Individuals seeking a self-serve legal AI subscription.
  • Firms requiring self-hosted or on-premises deployment.
  • Buyers needing public prices, quotas, or named foundation models.

Choose Litify if

  • Personal injury and mass tort firms.
  • Firms already using Salesforce.
  • Corporate legal departments managing spend.
  • Firms wanting AI agents on every matter.

Look elsewhere if

  • Solo lawyers on tight budgets.
  • Firms wanting self-serve setup.
  • Teams needing only legal research.

Eve logo Eve in brief

Eve launched in October 2023 as generative AI software for plaintiff lawyers, with Jay Madheswaran as founder and CEO. The company targets plaintiff-side practices, particularly personal injury, employment, and mass-tort firms. Reported funding reached $103 million in a September 2025 Series B led by Spark Capital, following a $47 million Series A led by Andreessen Horowitz in January 2025. Bloomberg reported a valuation above $1 billion at that time. Eve is therefore a venture-backed legal software company with a focused customer segment. It is designed for firms whose work centers on plaintiff matters, rather than for general legal research or broad consumer legal assistance. Its current branding is EveOS, reflecting the company’s broader operating-software positioning.

EveOS brings intake, case and firm operations, document analysis, drafting, and agentic workflows into one hosted service. A typical workflow can start with lead intake, continue through structured matter information and document review, and produce drafts or analysis for attorney oversight. The product includes an AI Intake Specialist and Reasoning Mode for litigation-document analysis. Its operating model also treats usage as a commercial variable: enterprise terms can meter matters, leads, voice minutes, pages, and per-matter charges. That matters for firms assessing total cost, because activity volume may affect the bill even when the workflow remains inside one application. Eve describes the product as an AI operating layer organized around cases and firm operations.

Commercial opacity is Eve’s clearest limitation: firms cannot compare a public platform price, plan minimum, API quota, or named model before contacting sales. Eve also has no documented self-hosted or on-premises deployment. Supio is the closest plaintiff-focused comparison, with Case Subscription and Unlimited Firm Access structures that describe unlimited usage, users, and pages, while Eve meters several categories. EvenUp covers a wider plaintiff workflow and combines specialized tools with human review. Filevine’s LOIS offers broader case-management automation tied to a system of record. Those distinctions make Eve most suitable for plaintiff firms that want a focused AI operating layer and can evaluate a custom contract against matter volume, oversight requirements, and existing systems.

Read the full Eve review

Litify logo Litify in brief

Litify was founded in 2016 by John Morgan, of the personal injury firm Morgan & Morgan, and Reuven Moskowitz, and Morgan & Morgan became one of its largest customers after migrating millions of client and case files. Bessemer Venture Partners took a majority stake in 2023. Litify says it serves more than 45,000 legal professionals, including Salesforce itself, plaintiff and defense firms, in-house legal teams, government agencies and nonprofits. Because it runs on Salesforce, firms get Salesforce's security, mobile apps, reporting and integrations, and can extend Litify with other Salesforce apps. In March 2026 Litify rebranded its product as an AI-native Platform of Action.

Litify covers the full case lifecycle. Intake tools capture leads, qualify them and send retainers for e-signature. Matter management tracks parties, deadlines, tasks, notes, emails and files, with configurable workflows for each practice area. Document management and generation, timekeeping, billing and eBilling, and real-time reports and dashboards are included, all configured in a no-code environment. For corporate legal departments, Litify offers enterprise legal management with matter intake, outside counsel spend control and eBilling. Litify says its platform runs on Salesforce and AWS, with Anthropic as its closed AI model provider. Implementation is a project, often with partners, rather than a self-serve signup.

Litify's strengths are its Salesforce foundation, end-to-end coverage from intake to billing, a growing library of native AI agents, strong personal injury features and support for corporate legal departments. Its weaknesses are a high starting price, implementation effort, dependence on Salesforce skills for deep customization and limited public pricing. Filevine offers similar configurable case management with LOIS AI and deposition tools. Clio suits smaller firms wanting simpler setup. EvenUp and Supio focus on AI for injury demands and case analysis. Eve targets plaintiff firms with AI-native workflows. Choose Litify if your firm wants a Salesforce-based platform with AI agents across every case.

Read the full Litify review

Frequently asked questions

How do Eve vs Litify compare on price?

Eve has no free plan, and its first paid plan (Custom contract) is listed at Custom. Litify has no free plan, and its first paid plan (Litify platform) is listed at From $200/user/month. Prices are from each company's pricing page and can change, so check before you buy.

Which has a free plan, Eve vs Litify?

None of them has a permanent free plan. Eve starts at Custom. Litify starts at From $200/user/month.

Can I self-host or integrate Eve vs Litify?

None of them is open source. All of them run as hosted services only. Litify offers a public API.

How much does Eve cost?

Eve does not publish a platform dollar price. Its homepage directs firms to schedule a call, and its enterprise terms state that private Orders set rates and entitlements. Fees can depend on aggregate matters, pages, leads, voice minutes, and per-matter charges. Excess usage can receive a monthly true-up, so the final cost depends on the firm’s contract and activity.

Does Eve have a free plan?

Eve does not publish a free plan or self-serve trial. The public buying path is a sales call followed by a private Order. That Order sets rates and entitlements, with usage categories that can include matters, pages, leads, and voice minutes. Firms should treat Eve as paid custom-contract software rather than freemium legal AI.

How much does Litify cost?

Litify's Salesforce AppExchange listing shows pricing starting at $200 per user a month, with discounts for nonprofits. Final pricing depends on the modules chosen, user count, Salesforce licensing and implementation services, and AI features are packaged by Litify's sales team. There is no free plan or self-serve trial.

What is Litify ACE?

Litify ACE, the Agentic Case Expert, is Litify's AI agent layer, launched in March 2026 and expanded in ACE 2.0. It understands each matter's data and documents and runs multi-step workflows such as qualifying intakes, scoring client sentiment, finding unused insurance coverage, drafting interrogatory responses and preparing deposition summaries.

Related comparisons

Sources