Google Stitch vs Visily: pricing, features and which to choose

Plans, prices, deployment options, strengths and limits for Google Stitch vs Visily, taken from each company's pricing page, docs and changelog. Updated October 2026.

Google StitchVisily
Google Stitch logo

Google Stitch

Design AI Tools

Google Stitch is a Google Labs web tool that turns text, images, code, and voice instructions into web and mobile UI designs, prototypes, and frontend output. It targets designers, developers, founders, and small teams exploring product flows. Access currently costs $0, with changing usage limits and no published paid plan.

Visily logo

Visily

Design AI Tools

Visily is a browser based AI workspace for wireframes, diagrams and interactive prototypes, made for product teams, founders and non designers. Its free Starter plan includes 300 AI credits per month, while Pro starts at $14 per editor/month and Business at $29 per editor/month. Visily announced that the service will shut down on October 31, 2026.

Quick comparison

FeatureGoogle StitchVisily
CategoryDesign AI ToolsDesign AI Tools
Main useAI UI designAI wireframing
Pricing modelFreeFree plan + paid tiers
Free plan Yes Yes
Entry paid plan$0/month (Free)$14/editor/month (Pro)
PlatformsWebWeb app
Open source No No
Self-hosted No No
Public API Yes Yes
Profile updatedOctober 2026October 2026

Pricing plans

Every public plan, as listed on each company's pricing page.

Google Stitch

  • Free$0/month

    Includes current Stitch features subject to changing account limits. Google publishes no paid upgrade, stable quota table, or guaranteed reset schedule; annual billing does not apply.

Visily

  • Starter$0/month

    300 AI credits per workspace/month. Includes two editable boards and 2,500 elements per board, with limited exports and a watermark.

  • Pro$14/editor/month

    3,000 AI credits per editor/month, unlimited boards and elements, Figma import and export, code export and MCP server. Monthly or annual billing.

  • Business$29/editor/month

    10,000 AI credits per editor/month, unlimited boards and elements, advanced security, SAML SSO, custom team management, workspace library and 30 day version history.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Custom requirements and pricing. The pricing page lists Enterprise capabilities as Custom.

Strengths and limits

Google Stitch

  • Text, image, code, and voice inputs support varied starting points.
  • Connected screens become clickable prototypes in the same canvas.
  • Figma, HTML, CSS, DESIGN.md, MCP, and SDK paths support handoff.
  • The free tier includes substantial design and prototyping functionality.
  • Quotas and model labels change without a stable public pricing table.
  • Generated layouts and frontend code require accessibility and engineering review.
  • Experimental status creates uncertainty for long lived design archives.

Visily

  • It converts text and screenshots into editable interface objects.
  • Pro includes Figma import, export and code export.
  • Multimodal prompts combine text, screenshots and selections.
  • The privacy policy says user data is not used to train Visily AI.
  • Visily announced a shutdown date of October 31, 2026.
  • Stored data is scheduled for permanent deletion on November 30, 2026.
  • AI and template credits do not roll over monthly.

Which should you choose?

Choose Google Stitch if

  • Designers exploring web and mobile flows from prompts, sketches, or screenshots.
  • Developers wanting Figma output and a fast frontend starting point.
  • Founders testing product directions before commissioning detailed design work.
  • Small teams building clickable prototypes without a paid design subscription.

Look elsewhere if

  • Organizations requiring enterprise procurement terms or guaranteed capacity.
  • Design teams needing mature permissions, version history, and shared libraries.
  • Projects that cannot send confidential material to an unpaid hosted AI service.

Choose Visily if

  • Existing users exporting Visily work before closure.
  • Product teams creating editable interface concepts quickly.
  • Non designers converting screenshots into wireframes.
  • Teams needing Figma or code export before shutdown.

Look elsewhere if

  • New production projects requiring long term availability.
  • Teams needing cloud retention after October 31, 2026.
  • Organizations requiring commercial rights beyond the published terms.

Google Stitch logo Google Stitch in brief

Google Stitch is a browser based UI design experiment from Google Labs, introduced on May 20, 2025 and rebuilt as an AI native infinite canvas on March 18, 2026. It turns text, images, screenshots, sketches, code fragments, and voice instructions into web and mobile interface designs, prototypes, and frontend output. A user can begin with a product description or rough reference instead of a blank design file. Stitch targets designers, developers, founders, and small teams exploring product flows. Its current scope runs from early ideas through connected prototypes and developer handoff. Google publishes no Stitch specific user, revenue, funding, or company scale figures. Because Stitch remains a Labs experiment, its long term availability is less certain than established design software used for lasting archives.

A typical Stitch workflow starts with a product description, screenshot, sketch, image, code fragment, or voice instruction. Generated screens appear on an infinite canvas, where users can request conversational edits, variants, critiques, layout changes, alternate palettes, and logical next screens. Screens can connect into clickable flows, and Play previews interactions. Stitch can extract design rules from a URL, while DESIGN.md transfers those rules between Stitch projects and coding tools. Users can paste output into Figma, export frontend code, and connect development workflows through the Stitch MCP server and SDK. Google also documents exports toward AI Studio and Antigravity. The March 2026 release added project wide canvas context, a design agent, an Agent manager for parallel directions, and voice design, extending work beyond single generated screens.

Stitch suits rapid product exploration and design to code handoff, especially for designers, developers, founders, and small teams that want free multimodal generation and connected prototypes. Figma remains stronger for established collaboration, permissions, version history, review processes, design systems, and shared libraries. Framer is a stronger choice for publishing responsive websites, while Visily focuses on accessible wireframing and diagram to UI work. Stitch can transfer designs into Figma, but generated layouts and frontend code require accessibility and engineering checks. Changing quotas make budgeting difficult, and experimental status creates uncertainty for long lived archives. Pick Google Stitch if free prompt, image, and voice exploration plus Google developer integrations matter most; pick Figma for mature team controls, or Framer for responsive website publishing.

Read the full Google Stitch review

Visily logo Visily in brief

Visily is a browser based workspace for brainstorming, wireframing, diagramming and prototyping product interfaces. It targets product managers, founders, engineers, designers and non designers who need editable concepts without beginning in a blank design file. Users can start with a text prompt, screenshot, diagram or canvas selection, then refine editable screens and components on boards containing screens, diagrams or prototypes. Themes, custom fonts, interactive transitions, comments and real time co design support early discovery and handoff preparation. The browser extension converts captured interface screenshots into wireframes. Visily also lists Notion, Jira and Slack integrations, Figma import and export, code export and an MCP server for retrieving assets. The service is active now, but its announced October 31, 2026 shutdown defines any current evaluation.

Visily describes AI as a collaborative layer combining text, screenshots and canvas selections, without naming one public foundation model. Release notes list multimodal AI, diagram to design, auto prototyping, custom fonts, browser capture and improved screenshot conversion during 2025. Design Instructions and Deep Design arrived in January 2026, Figma import in February, and code generation with Plan Mode in March. AI and template actions consume credits, while Deep Design uses more credits than standard generation. Visily says Version 4.0 improves detailed instruction handling and previews themes with updated palettes, fonts and layouts. This makes Visily useful for product teams creating editable interface concepts quickly, especially non designers converting screenshots into wireframes. It does not replace a mature design system process when teams need stable collaboration, long term files or continued cloud access.

Visily competed most directly with Uizard, Figma and MockFlow. Uizard is the closest comparison for prompt and screenshot driven interface concepts, while Visily adds boards containing diagrams and prototypes, Figma exchange, code export and an MCP server. Figma has the stronger long term file and collaboration position for design handoff. MockFlow remains a browser based option for wireframes and prototypes. Visily’s Starter plan is free, and paid plans offer more credits, unlimited boards and elements, exports and collaboration features, but those benefits are constrained by the announced shutdown and scheduled data deletion. Existing users should export their work before closure. Uizard should be picked for rapid AI wireframing, Figma for durable design collaboration, and Visily only by existing users completing exports before shutdown.

Read the full Visily review

Frequently asked questions

How do Google Stitch vs Visily compare on price?

Google Stitch has a free option, and its first paid plan (Free) is listed at $0/month. Visily has a free option, and its first paid plan (Pro) is listed at $14/editor/month. Prices are from each company's pricing page and can change, so check before you buy.

Which has a free plan, Google Stitch vs Visily?

All of them. Google Stitch: Includes current Stitch features subject to changing account limits. Google publishes no paid upgrade, stable quota table, or guaranteed reset schedule; annual billing does not apply. Visily: 300 AI credits per workspace/month. Includes two editable boards and 2,500 elements per board, with limited exports and a watermark.

Can I self-host or integrate Google Stitch vs Visily?

None of them is open source. All of them run as hosted services only. Google Stitch and Visily offer a public API.

How much does Google Stitch cost?

Google Stitch currently costs $0 per month during its Labs availability. Google has not announced a subscription, paid plan, credit purchase, or public price table. Access remains quota limited, and reported allowances have changed between releases. Check the usage panel in the product before planning a large project because Google does not guarantee a fixed monthly or daily allowance.

Is Google Stitch free to use?

Yes. Stitch provides its current canvas, generation, prototype, voice, Figma, code, and developer handoff features without a monetary charge. A Google account is required, and use is limited by account allowances that Google can change. There is no published paid tier that raises those limits. The free service should not receive confidential or personal material under Google’s unpaid AI terms.

How much does Visily cost?

Visily lists Starter at $0/month, Pro at $14 per editor/month and Business at $29 per editor/month. Monthly billing is available for Pro, and annual billing charges the workspace once per year on its subscription anniversary. Enterprise is listed as Custom. These are the published plan prices before the announced October 31, 2026 shutdown.

Does Visily have a free plan?

Yes. Starter costs $0/month and includes 300 AI credits per workspace/month, two editable boards and a 2,500 element limit per board. The plan has limited exports and a watermark. Pro and Business add unlimited boards and elements, Figma exchange, code export and additional collaboration features.

Related comparisons

Sources