Apollo.io vs Salesloft: pricing, features and which to choose

Plans, prices, deployment options, strengths and limits for Apollo.io vs Salesloft, taken from each company's pricing page, docs and changelog. Updated October 2026.

Apollo.ioSalesloft
Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

Sales AI Tools

Apollo.io is a sales intelligence and go-to-market platform for founders, sales teams, marketers, and revenue operations groups that need prospect data, enrichment, sequencing, calling, and AI-assisted workflows. A free plan costs $0, while paid plans start at $49 per seat monthly with annual billing, according to October 2026 coverage from ZoomInfo.

Salesloft logo

Salesloft

Sales AI Tools

Salesloft is a revenue orchestration platform for mid-market and enterprise revenue teams. It combines sales engagement, conversation intelligence, deal management, forecasting, seller prioritization and AI agents under the Salesloft brand after its merger with Clari. Current pricing is quote-led, with Advanced and Elite as the named packages and no public entry price.

Quick comparison

FeatureApollo.ioSalesloft
CategorySales AI ToolsSales AI Tools
Main useSales prospectingRevenue orchestration
Pricing modelFree plan + paid tiersPaid only
Free plan Yes No
Entry paid plan$49/seat/month, billed annually (Basic)Custom (Advanced)
PlatformsWeb & APIWeb & API
Open source No No
Self-hosted No No
Public API Yes Yes
Profile updatedOctober 2026October 2026

Pricing plans

Every public plan, as listed on each company's pricing page.

Apollo.io

  • Free$0/month

    Free access remains available without a time limit. It includes five AI Assistant chats per billing cycle, ten messages per chat, Gmail connections, and one seat after downgrade.

  • Basic$49/seat/month, billed annually

    October 2026 ZoomInfo coverage lists 30,000 credits per seat yearly, one mailbox, 250 daily emails, five team workflows, and 1,000 records per selection.

  • Professional$79/seat/month, billed annually

    October 2026 ZoomInfo coverage lists 48,000 credits per seat yearly, unlimited daily sends, AI features, call recording, 50 team workflows, and 2,500 records per selection.

  • Organization$119/seat/month, billed annually

    October 2026 ZoomInfo coverage lists 72,000 credits per seat yearly and a three-seat minimum. Apollo’s official plan page names Custom rather than Organization.

  • CustomCustom

    Apollo describes Custom for teams needing custom volumes, SSO, advanced security, dedicated support, or complex integration requirements.

Salesloft

  • AdvancedCustom

    Quote-based package for sales engagement. Exact seat minimums, included features, add-ons, and contract terms are set in the sales proposal.

  • EliteCustom

    Designed for complex enterprise requirements with multi-team administration, sandbox support and CRM signals for custom objects.

Strengths and limits

Apollo.io

  • Apollo combines prospect data, enrichment, sequences, and pipeline tools.
  • The AI Assistant can turn natural-language requests into sales actions.
  • Free accounts remain available without a short trial deadline.
  • The API supports enrichment, organization search, and AI insight workflows.
  • Paid costs vary by seats, billing frequency, add-ons, and credit usage.
  • Credits expire at the end of each billing cycle.
  • Standard plans restrict external resale and customer-facing data products.

Salesloft

  • It connects sales engagement with conversations, deals and forecasting.
  • Its Advanced and Elite packages address different enterprise administration needs.
  • REST APIs support OAuth 2.0, private applications and customer API keys.
  • The combined platform covers seller execution and revenue intelligence.
  • Current pricing is quote-led and package entitlements can vary.
  • Deals documentation identifies a Salesforce CRM dependency.
  • Several capabilities are add-ons or package-dependent.

Which should you choose?

Choose Apollo.io if

  • Small teams building outbound prospecting programs.
  • Sales teams combining contact data with sequencing.
  • Revenue operations teams managing shared credits.
  • Teams wanting AI actions inside sales workflows.

Look elsewhere if

  • Teams needing fixed paid pricing without a calculator or checkout.
  • Organizations selling Apollo data through customer products.
  • Teams wanting an open-source or self-hosted database.

Choose Salesloft if

  • Enterprise revenue teams needing engagement and forecasting in one platform.
  • Sales leaders coordinating Cadence, Conversations, Deals and Forecast workflows.
  • Teams using Salesforce that need connected seller execution and deal inspection.
  • Organizations evaluating AI agents for account research and coaching workflows.

Look elsewhere if

  • Small teams requiring transparent self-serve pricing.
  • Buyers seeking a documented self-hosted deployment.
  • Teams wanting a standalone prospect database as their primary tool.

Apollo.io logo Apollo.io in brief

Apollo.io is a sales intelligence and go-to-market platform made by ZenLeads, Inc., doing business as Apollo.io. Founded in 2015, it released its first product in 2016 and says it reached $150 million in annual recurring revenue in May 2025. Apollo also reports more than 500,000 companies using the platform and more than 50,000 weekly active users in 2025. Its 2023 Series D raised $100 million at a reported $1.6 billion valuation. The product combines a business contact database with prospect search, enrichment, sequencing, calling, pipeline support, analytics, and AI features. That combination places Apollo closer to a sales operating system than a standalone lead database, serving founders, sales teams, marketers, and revenue operations groups.

Apollo’s workflow usually begins with finding people or companies through filters, then selecting records for enrichment, lists, sequences, or exports. Email campaigns are available on every account. Free users can connect Gmail, while paid users can connect Microsoft Office and other providers. Teams can create sequences, manage pipeline activity, record calls, prepare for conversations, and review AI-generated insights. The AI Assistant accepts natural-language requests, uses Apollo data and saved messaging context, and can find decision-makers, research accounts, build sequences, export lists, and report on performance. Scheduled agents can run some outbound tasks in the background. Permissions still govern available actions, and Apollo advises reviewing generated messages, matches, and credit estimates before execution.

Apollo’s main limitation is pricing and usage complexity: the final amount depends on seats, billing frequency, credits, add-ons, and selected features. Basic includes one mailbox, 250 daily emails, five team workflows, and 1,000 records per selection, while Professional raises several limits and adds AI and call features. Standard plans are for internal business use, so powering external products, sharing data with customers, or reselling it requires a separate agreement. Apollo competes with ZoomInfo, Cognism, Outreach, Salesloft, and HubSpot Sales Hub. It combines data and enrichment more closely than Outreach or Salesloft, and adds execution tools beyond ZoomInfo or Cognism. Choose Apollo if one team needs prospect intelligence, outbound execution, enrichment, and AI actions together.

Read the full Apollo.io review

Salesloft logo Salesloft in brief

Salesloft is a revenue orchestration platform for mid-market and enterprise teams. Its suite covers Cadence for sales engagement, Conversations for recording and intelligence, Deals for deal execution, Forecast for forecasting, Rhythm for seller prioritization, and AI agents for account research and coaching. The company says its Predictive Revenue System connects buyer engagement, conversation, deal, and forecast signals to seller actions. Salesloft reports more than 4,000 customers, including Adobe, 3M, IBM, and Zoom. Its merger with Clari completed in December 2025, establishing Salesloft as the go-forward company and platform brand. Clari Forecast retains its name, while broader Clari capabilities continue under Salesloft. Current packaging includes Advanced and Elite, with some features offered as add-ons or package-dependent modules.

Salesloft brings outbound execution and revenue intelligence into one connected workflow. A team can use Cadence to organize multichannel outreach, Conversations to capture buyer interactions, Deals to inspect opportunities, Forecast to evaluate expected revenue, and Rhythm to prioritize seller actions. AI agents support account research and coaching workflows. The company says its system connects buyer engagement, conversation, deal and forecast signals so revenue teams can turn them into prioritized work. Exact workflows depend on purchased modules and CRM configuration. Deals documentation identifies a Salesforce CRM dependency, making CRM fit an important procurement question. The platform is therefore broader than a sequencing tool, but its value depends on which modules a customer buys and how those modules connect to existing systems.

Salesloft suits revenue organizations that want engagement, conversations, deals and forecasting connected in one commercial platform, although quote-led packaging makes comparisons harder. Outreach is a close alternative for enterprise sequencing and seller workflows, while Gong focuses on conversation intelligence and revenue analysis. ZoomInfo Sales combines prospect data, engagement and intent. HubSpot Sales Hub and Salesforce Sales Engagement are more natural choices for teams prioritizing CRM-native execution. Salesloft is a poor fit for buyers seeking transparent self-serve pricing or a documented self-hosted edition. Choose it when a mid-market or enterprise revenue team wants coordinated engagement and forecasting under one brand, with exact module availability and costs determined during procurement rather than through a complete public rate card.

Read the full Salesloft review

Frequently asked questions

How do Apollo.io vs Salesloft compare on price?

Apollo.io has a free option, and its first paid plan (Basic) is listed at $49/seat/month, billed annually. Salesloft has no free plan, and its first paid plan (Advanced) is listed at Custom. Prices are from each company's pricing page and can change, so check before you buy.

Which has a free plan, Apollo.io vs Salesloft?

Apollo.io offers a free plan or free self-hosted use. Salesloft requires a paid plan.

Can I self-host or integrate Apollo.io vs Salesloft?

None of them is open source. All of them run as hosted services only. Apollo.io and Salesloft offer a public API.

How much does Apollo.io cost?

Apollo’s Free plan costs $0 per month. October 2026 coverage from ZoomInfo lists Basic at $49, Professional at $79, and Organization at $119 per seat monthly when billed annually, with three seats required for Organization. Apollo’s official page names Free, Basic, Professional, and Custom, while its calculator says final costs depend on seats, usage, add-ons, and billing frequency.

Does Apollo.io have a free plan?

Yes. Apollo offers a Free plan without a time limit after a trial. Free accounts include five AI Assistant chats per billing cycle, with ten messages per chat, and Gmail connections for campaigns. Apollo says downgrading limits the account to one seat. Credits are granted according to the account and expire at the end of each billing cycle.

How much does Salesloft cost?

Salesloft does not publish a complete current public rate card. Current help materials identify Advanced and Elite packages, with exact pricing and entitlements handled through an account representative. A transition article lists historical Advanced pricing at $180 and Premier pricing at $220, but those packages belong to earlier packaging and should not be treated as current universal prices.

Does Salesloft have a free plan?

Salesloft does not list a current free plan in its package documentation. Its current named packages are Advanced and Elite, both quote-led. Forecasting, Account Agent, Coaching Agent and Dialer may be add-ons or package-dependent. Buyers should request a current package breakdown because contents can vary by agreement.

Related comparisons

Sources