Cline vs OpenCode: pricing, features and which to choose

Cline is an open source coding agent from Cline Bot Inc. The project was created in July 2024 and is distributed through a VS Code extension, CLI, desktop app, JetBrains plugin, and SDK. Its GitHub repository lists the Apache License 2.0 and more than 70,000 stars. Cline’s July 2025 funding announcement says the company raised $32 million across seed and Series A rounds. The agent is built for developers who want to inspect code, edit files, run commands, and choose model providers. The same core supports editor work, terminal sessions, desktop use, and embedded applications. The client is free for individual developers, while AI inference can use Cline credits, ClinePass, or a developer’s own provider credentials.

Cline reads project files, writes code, runs terminal commands, uses a browser, and works with external tools. A typical task can begin in Plan mode, where the developer reviews an approach, then move to Act mode for implementation. The interface asks for approval before actions, while auto-approve can reduce interruptions. File edits appear as diffs, and checkpoints support undoing agent changes. Project rules in .clinerules files describe coding standards, architecture, testing, and deployment conventions. MCP servers add tools for databases, APIs, and infrastructure. Cline also supports plugins, skills, messaging connections, scheduled tasks, headless automation, and multi-agent workflows. The CLI supports interactive and headless operation, making the same agent available for local development, scripting, and CI work.

Cline still requires review of generated edits, shell commands, model output, checkpoints, and provider availability. Telemetry is enabled by default in the VS Code and JetBrains extensions, desktop app, and CLI, although users can turn it off. Requests made through Cline or ClinePass can include prompts and model responses in Cline’s handling of those providers, while requests using other providers go to those providers under their policies. Cursor is a closer commercial editor competitor, GitHub Copilot is closely tied to GitHub workflows, and Windsurf is another agentic coding product. Cline suits developers who want Apache-licensed code, provider choice, local runtimes, and explicit action approval. Teams wanting a managed editor subscription with bundled model access may prefer Cursor, Copilot, or Windsurf.

OpenCode is an open source coding agent for terminal, desktop, and IDE workflows. The public site reports more than 215,000 GitHub stars, 950 contributors, 20,000 commits, and more than 16 million developers monthly, figures the company can change. The repository identifies the software as MIT licensed. Current documentation distinguishes OpenCode 1 and OpenCode 2, which share the same command name and cannot coexist under default installation paths. Version 2.1.2 is dated October 21, 2026. OpenCode is best understood as a client and agent layer rather than one hosted assistant. It can inspect repositories, explain code, edit files, run commands, and keep multiple sessions. The MIT license permits commercial modification and distribution subject to its conditions.

A typical workflow starts in a project directory with the opencode command. The documentation describes an /init command that creates an AGENTS.md file for project structure and coding conventions. OpenCode separates a build agent from a plan agent: the build agent can edit files and run commands, while the plan agent is read-only by default and asks before bash commands. Sessions can use LSP integration, provider selection, and a general subagent. Developers can connect OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT Plus or Pro, local models, OpenCode Zen, or OpenCode Go. The terminal, desktop, and IDE clients support the same provider choice. This workflow is adaptable, although the account, model, quota, and data terms depend on the selected route.

OpenCode's main tradeoff is choice. Provider selection can reduce lock-in, but it also makes billing, privacy, and troubleshooting less predictable than a single-vendor product. The Go privacy table says most listed models do not use prompts for training, while Muse Spark models permit training and Gemini 4 Argon Contributor may use prompts and completions for future Google models. Compared with Claude Code, OpenCode offers local models and a broader provider route. Compared with Cursor, it is more terminal centered and MIT licensed. Compared with Aider, it adds desktop and IDE clients. Pick OpenCode for repository work when provider flexibility matters more than one unified account and bill.