Apollo.io vs Seamless.AI: pricing, features and which to choose

Plans, prices, deployment options, strengths and limits for Apollo.io vs Seamless.AI, taken from each company's pricing page, docs and changelog. Updated October 2026.

Apollo.ioSeamless.AI
Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

Sales AI Tools

Apollo.io is a sales intelligence and go-to-market platform for founders, sales teams, marketers, and revenue operations groups that need prospect data, enrichment, sequencing, calling, and AI-assisted workflows. A free plan costs $0, while paid plans start at $49 per seat monthly with annual billing, according to October 2026 coverage from ZoomInfo.

Seamless.AI logo

Seamless.AI

Sales AI Tools

Seamless.AI is a B2B sales intelligence platform for sales, recruiting, marketing, and revenue operations teams. It searches and enriches contact and company records, supports outreach workflows, and exposes the same data through an API. The free license costs $0 and includes 50 Universal Credits, while paid licenses are custom quoted.

Seamless.AI announced its rebrand to Seamless on February 10, 2026. The official website remains seamless.ai.

Quick comparison

FeatureApollo.ioSeamless.AI
CategorySales AI ToolsSales AI Tools
Main useSales prospectingB2B prospecting
Pricing modelFree plan + paid tiersPay per use
Free plan Yes Yes
Entry paid plan$49/seat/month, billed annually (Basic)$0 (Free)
PlatformsWeb & APIWeb & Chrome
Open source No No
Self-hosted No No
Public API Yes Yes
Profile updatedOctober 2026October 2026

Pricing plans

Every public plan, as listed on each company's pricing page.

Apollo.io

  • Free$0/month

    Free access remains available without a time limit. It includes five AI Assistant chats per billing cycle, ten messages per chat, Gmail connections, and one seat after downgrade.

  • Basic$49/seat/month, billed annually

    October 2026 ZoomInfo coverage lists 30,000 credits per seat yearly, one mailbox, 250 daily emails, five team workflows, and 1,000 records per selection.

  • Professional$79/seat/month, billed annually

    October 2026 ZoomInfo coverage lists 48,000 credits per seat yearly, unlimited daily sends, AI features, call recording, 50 team workflows, and 2,500 records per selection.

  • Organization$119/seat/month, billed annually

    October 2026 ZoomInfo coverage lists 72,000 credits per seat yearly and a three-seat minimum. Apollo’s official plan page names Custom rather than Organization.

  • CustomCustom

    Apollo describes Custom for teams needing custom volumes, SSO, advanced security, dedicated support, or complex integration requirements.

Seamless.AI

  • Free$0

    50 Universal Credits once; credits do not replenish.

  • BasicCustom

    250 Universal Credits per month, refreshed on the contract date.

  • ProCustom

    10,000 Universal Credits per month, refreshed on the contract date.

  • Bulk purchase poolCustom

    One-time or recurring organization credit pools; quantities and pricing are negotiated.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Custom credits, integrations, support, and workflow requirements.

Strengths and limits

Apollo.io

  • Apollo combines prospect data, enrichment, sequences, and pipeline tools.
  • The AI Assistant can turn natural-language requests into sales actions.
  • Free accounts remain available without a short trial deadline.
  • The API supports enrichment, organization search, and AI insight workflows.
  • Paid costs vary by seats, billing frequency, add-ons, and credit usage.
  • Credits expire at the end of each billing cycle.
  • Standard plans restrict external resale and customer-facing data products.

Seamless.AI

  • The free license provides 50 credits without payment.
  • Universal Credits cover search, enrichment, AI, and automation.
  • The API supports search, enrichment, polling, webhooks, and MCP.
  • Job changes, intent, Chrome, and outreach extend beyond lookup.
  • Paid license prices are not publicly listed.
  • Several actions and API searches consume the same credit balance.
  • API terms restrict resale, spam, caching, and unauthorized aggregation.

Which should you choose?

Choose Apollo.io if

  • Small teams building outbound prospecting programs.
  • Sales teams combining contact data with sequencing.
  • Revenue operations teams managing shared credits.
  • Teams wanting AI actions inside sales workflows.

Look elsewhere if

  • Teams needing fixed paid pricing without a calculator or checkout.
  • Organizations selling Apollo data through customer products.
  • Teams wanting an open-source or self-hosted database.

Choose Seamless.AI if

  • Sales teams building targeted B2B prospect lists.
  • RevOps teams enriching CRM records through an API.
  • Recruiters searching contacts across changing companies.
  • Small teams testing prospecting before buying seats.

Look elsewhere if

  • Teams requiring a transparent paid price list.
  • Buyers needing guaranteed contact accuracy without verification work.
  • Users wanting unrestricted resale or advertising use of data.

Apollo.io logo Apollo.io in brief

Apollo.io is a sales intelligence and go-to-market platform made by ZenLeads, Inc., doing business as Apollo.io. Founded in 2015, it released its first product in 2016 and says it reached $150 million in annual recurring revenue in May 2025. Apollo also reports more than 500,000 companies using the platform and more than 50,000 weekly active users in 2025. Its 2023 Series D raised $100 million at a reported $1.6 billion valuation. The product combines a business contact database with prospect search, enrichment, sequencing, calling, pipeline support, analytics, and AI features. That combination places Apollo closer to a sales operating system than a standalone lead database, serving founders, sales teams, marketers, and revenue operations groups.

Apollo’s workflow usually begins with finding people or companies through filters, then selecting records for enrichment, lists, sequences, or exports. Email campaigns are available on every account. Free users can connect Gmail, while paid users can connect Microsoft Office and other providers. Teams can create sequences, manage pipeline activity, record calls, prepare for conversations, and review AI-generated insights. The AI Assistant accepts natural-language requests, uses Apollo data and saved messaging context, and can find decision-makers, research accounts, build sequences, export lists, and report on performance. Scheduled agents can run some outbound tasks in the background. Permissions still govern available actions, and Apollo advises reviewing generated messages, matches, and credit estimates before execution.

Apollo’s main limitation is pricing and usage complexity: the final amount depends on seats, billing frequency, credits, add-ons, and selected features. Basic includes one mailbox, 250 daily emails, five team workflows, and 1,000 records per selection, while Professional raises several limits and adds AI and call features. Standard plans are for internal business use, so powering external products, sharing data with customers, or reselling it requires a separate agreement. Apollo competes with ZoomInfo, Cognism, Outreach, Salesloft, and HubSpot Sales Hub. It combines data and enrichment more closely than Outreach or Salesloft, and adds execution tools beyond ZoomInfo or Cognism. Choose Apollo if one team needs prospect intelligence, outbound execution, enrichment, and AI actions together.

Read the full Apollo.io review

Seamless.AI logo Seamless.AI in brief

Seamless.AI is a B2B sales intelligence platform from Seamless Contacts Inc., founded in 2015 and based in Columbus, Ohio. CB Insights lists $3.38 million in total funding. Founder and CEO Brandon Bornancin remains the public face of the company. The business announced a rebrand to Seamless on February 10, 2026, while keeping seamless.ai as its website. Company figures point to rapid expansion: more than 500,000 sales teams in a June 2025 announcement, then more than 1,000,000 in the rebrand announcement. Its 2025 review reported 70 million contact searches and 13 million company searches. Those figures describe company-reported activity, not independently audited customer totals, but they show the product's intended scale and commercial focus clearly.

A normal workflow begins with filters for title, industry, geography, company size, and related company or contact fields. Users can research a person, save the record, enrich an uploaded list, or send contacts into outreach workflows. The product includes a Chrome extension, Job Change Enrich, Buyer Intent, org charts, AI Assistant, Autopilot, AI Campaigns, and CRM connections. Developers use a separate search and research sequence. They authenticate with an API key or OAuth, search contacts or companies, submit selected results for research, then retrieve results through polling or webhooks. The API also offers MCP access for Cursor, Claude, and ChatGPT. That gives technical teams a path to build CRM, warehouse, or agent workflows around the same contact data.

Credit accounting is the main constraint. Search, enrichment, research, AI actions, and automation use overlapping balances, and inaccurate records can still consume credits. Paid prices are not public, and API terms prohibit spam, resale, unauthorized aggregation, sensitive personal information, and unapproved caching. ZoomInfo is stronger for enterprise account intelligence and intent programs, while Seamless offers a free test and a prospecting workflow. Apollo.io presents a more explicit multichannel sequencing model, whereas Seamless emphasizes data discovery and enrichment. Lusha suits smaller contact lookups with fewer automation surfaces. Seamless is the better pick for B2B prospecting and API enrichment when a team can monitor credit use.

Read the full Seamless.AI review

Frequently asked questions

How do Apollo.io vs Seamless.AI compare on price?

Apollo.io has a free option, and its first paid plan (Basic) is listed at $49/seat/month, billed annually. Seamless.AI has a free option, and its first paid plan (Free) is listed at $0. Prices are from each company's pricing page and can change, so check before you buy.

Which has a free plan, Apollo.io vs Seamless.AI?

All of them. Apollo.io: Free access remains available without a time limit. It includes five AI Assistant chats per billing cycle, ten messages per chat, Gmail connections, and one seat after downgrade. Seamless.AI: 50 Universal Credits once; credits do not replenish.

Can I self-host or integrate Apollo.io vs Seamless.AI?

None of them is open source. All of them run as hosted services only. Apollo.io and Seamless.AI offer a public API.

How much does Apollo.io cost?

Apollo’s Free plan costs $0 per month. October 2026 coverage from ZoomInfo lists Basic at $49, Professional at $79, and Organization at $119 per seat monthly when billed annually, with three seats required for Organization. Apollo’s official page names Free, Basic, Professional, and Custom, while its calculator says final costs depend on seats, usage, add-ons, and billing frequency.

Does Apollo.io have a free plan?

Yes. Apollo offers a Free plan without a time limit after a trial. Free accounts include five AI Assistant chats per billing cycle, with ten messages per chat, and Gmail connections for campaigns. Apollo says downgrading limits the account to one seat. Credits are granted according to the account and expire at the end of each billing cycle.

How much does Seamless.AI cost?

Seamless.AI does not publish dollar prices for its paid licenses. The free license costs $0 and includes 50 Universal Credits. Basic includes 250 monthly credits and Pro includes 10,000 monthly credits, but both are custom quoted. Bulk credit pools and enterprise packages are also custom. Credit use varies by search, enrichment, AI, automation, and API activity.

Does Seamless.AI have a free plan?

Yes. The free license includes 50 Universal Credits, and those credits do not replenish. Contact research generally uses one credit per contact, while API search uses one credit per 10 returned results, rounded up. The allocation can test the interface and data workflow, but it is too small for sustained list building or enrichment.

Related comparisons

Sources