LanguageTool vs QuillBot: pricing, features and which to choose

Plans, prices, deployment options, strengths and limits for LanguageTool vs QuillBot, taken from each company's pricing page, docs and changelog. Updated October 2026.

LanguageToolQuillBot
LanguageTool logo

LanguageTool

Writing AI Tools

LanguageTool is a multilingual grammar and style checker for students, professionals, teams, and developers. Its open-source core supports local or cloud deployment, while hosted Premium adds larger text limits, advanced checks, style guides, and unlimited AI paraphrasing. Basic is free, while paid prices vary by locale, VAT, and billing cycle.

QuillBot logo

QuillBot

Writing AI Tools

QuillBot is a web, extension, desktop, and mobile writing assistant for students, language learners, and professionals. Its free tools provide limited paraphrasing and grammar access alongside summarizing, translation, citation, and AI detection features, while Premium expands usage and modes. Learneo acquired QuillBot in September 2021.

Quick comparison

FeatureLanguageToolQuillBot
CategoryWriting AI ToolsWriting AI Tools
Main useGrammar checkingParaphrasing
Pricing modelFree plan + paid tiersFree plan + paid tiers
Free plan Yes Yes
Entry paid plan$0 (Basic)$19.95/month (Premium monthly)
PlatformsWeb, apps, APIWeb & extensions
Open source Yes No
Self-hosted Yes No
Public API Yes No
Profile updatedOctober 2026October 2026

Pricing plans

Every public plan, as listed on each company's pricing page.

LanguageTool

  • Basic$0

    2,000 characters per text field, basic checking, and three AI sentence rephrasings per day.

  • PremiumLocalized price

    Up to 150,000 characters per field, advanced checks, a personal style guide, browser integrations, and unlimited AI sentence paraphrasing. Prices vary by locale, VAT, and billing cycle.

  • TeamsLocalized price

    Premium features plus user management, a shared style guide, and a team dictionary. Billing help describes teams of up to 20 users.

QuillBot

  • Free$0/month

    Limited paraphrasing and grammar access; several other tools remain available with tool-specific limits.

  • Premium monthly$19.95/month

    Monthly billing with expanded modes, inputs, plagiarism access, detector features, and other Premium functions.

  • Premium quarterly$39.95/quarter

    Billed every three months with Premium features and expanded writing-tool access.

  • Premium annual$99.95/year

    Billed every twelve months; the published equivalent is $8.33 monthly.

  • TeamCustom

    QuillBot does not publish Team pricing; Team inputs are excluded from model training by default.

Strengths and limits

LanguageTool

  • The core software is open source and can run locally or in a cloud environment.
  • LanguageTool supports more than 30 languages and offers broad application integrations.
  • Premium combines advanced checking, 150,000-character fields, style guides, and unlimited paraphrasing.
  • The commercial API offers German hosting and says submitted API texts are not stored.
  • The public API has low rate and text-volume limits and prohibits automated requests.
  • LanguageTool shows prices by region, with no single fixed USD subscription price.
  • LanguageTool does not publish a definitive customer-text AI-training policy in the cited material.

QuillBot

  • It combines paraphrasing, grammar, translation, summaries, and citations.
  • Premium pricing has clearly published numerical subscription options.
  • The service works through web tools, extensions, desktop, and mobile experiences.
  • QuillBot labels detector results as estimates rather than authorship verdicts.
  • Free limits differ across tools and surfaces.
  • Paraphrasing can alter meaning or remove necessary nuance.
  • Extension text storage is enabled by default unless users change controls.

Which should you choose?

Choose LanguageTool if

  • Multilingual writers needing grammar and style suggestions across more than 30 languages.
  • Organizations needing a self-hostable proofreading core or commercial HTTP API.
  • Professionals writing long documents above the free 2,000-character field limit.
  • Teams needing shared style rules, dictionaries, and account administration.

Look elsewhere if

  • Users requiring a clearly published USD subscription price before checkout.
  • Organizations seeking a published guarantee about AI training on hosted customer text.
  • Developers needing an unrestricted public API with high request volumes.

Choose QuillBot if

  • Students revising essays and formatting citations.
  • Language learners comparing translations and paraphrases.
  • Professionals polishing short emails and documents.
  • Writers wanting several revision tools in one service.

Look elsewhere if

  • High-stakes authorship decisions based on detector scores.
  • Teams requiring a fixed, publicly listed enterprise price.
  • Editors seeking a replacement for human copyediting.

LanguageTool logo LanguageTool in brief

LanguageTool is a grammar, spelling, punctuation, style, and paraphrasing service that began as Daniel Naber’s computational-linguistics diploma project in 2003. It later became commercial and Learneo acquired it on April 5, 2023, for undisclosed financial terms. LanguageTool says its browser add-on has more than 2 million active installations, serves more than 150 companies, and improves more than 20 million texts daily. These figures are company claims. The product supports more than 30 languages and remains separate from Learneo’s other writing brands. Its open-source core can run locally or in the cloud. Hosted Premium and AI features are commercial services, giving users a choice between self-managed checking and expanded hosted capabilities for writing, editing, and paraphrasing.

A typical LanguageTool workflow begins in a browser extension, desktop application, mobile application, supported word processor, or the LanguageTool editor. The service identifies spelling, grammar, punctuation, word choice, style, typography, and some contextual issues, then offers suggestions users may accept or reject. Premium adds more than 20,000 additional checks for several major languages, a personal style guide, text statistics, larger fields, and unlimited sentence paraphrasing. Teams add user management, shared style guidance, and a shared dictionary. Developers can submit text through the HTTP API, while organizations can request a commercial API or run the server themselves. This range makes the product applicable to individual writing, managed team workflows, and developer integrations requiring programmatic checking.

LanguageTool suits multilingual checking, open-source deployment, and writing through browsers or word processors. Grammarly is the closer consumer comparison, emphasizing English rewriting and business administration, while QuillBot focuses more heavily on paraphrasing. Microsoft Editor is convenient for Microsoft 365 users, but LanguageTool provides a self-hostable core and public checking API. The public API permits 20 requests per IP per minute, 75 KB of text per IP per minute, and 20 KB per request, while automated requests are prohibited. LanguageTool is therefore most suitable when language coverage, deployment control, or local hosting matters more than a larger proprietary suite. Users needing heavy automated traffic should note the public limits and consider the commercial API or self-hosting instead.

Read the full LanguageTool review

QuillBot logo QuillBot in brief

QuillBot is an AI-powered writing companion founded in 2017 by University of Illinois computer science students Rohan Gupta, Anil Jason, and David Silin. Learneo, formerly Course Hero, acquired QuillBot in September 2021, and Gupta leads Learneo’s writing vertical. Learneo’s leadership page describes QuillBot as having more than 30 million monthly active users. The product has grown from its original writing-improvement focus into a suite covering paraphrasing, grammar checking, translation, summarization, citation generation, plagiarism checking, AI detection, AI chat, AI humanization, and image generation. Its core audience includes students, language learners, researchers, professionals, and other writers who want assistance revising or understanding text. It remains a writing service rather than a general-purpose publishing application.

A typical QuillBot workflow begins with text entered or uploaded through its web tools, browser extensions, desktop app, or mobile experience. Users can paraphrase text in more than 10 modes, including Academic and Simple, adjust synonym use, check grammar, summarize documents, translate between languages, or generate citations. The AI Detector analyzes text for patterns associated with AI writing and returns a percentage estimate, while Premium users can download full reports. The service also lists plagiarism checking, AI Humanizer, AI Chat, and AI Image Generator among its tools. These functions operate as connected but distinct writing utilities. Users should review every rewrite for meaning, source accuracy, citation completeness, and appropriate attribution before submitting or publishing the result.

QuillBot’s main caveat is that rewriting can alter nuance, while AI detection cannot establish authorship. Its privacy materials say inputs and usage data may support service improvement and personalization. For browser extensions version 4.37.0 or later, text storage is on by default, with controls to opt out of storage and model training; Team inputs are excluded from training by default. LanguageTool, Grammarly, and Wordtune are direct alternatives for writing assistance, with LanguageTool a close fit for multilingual correction and Grammarly a close fit for broad workplace writing. These are editorial fit comparisons, not claims about identical features. Pick QuillBot if paraphrasing, translation, citations, and study-oriented writing tools matter more than continuous workplace correction.

Read the full QuillBot review

Frequently asked questions

How do LanguageTool vs QuillBot compare on price?

LanguageTool has a free option, and its first paid plan (Basic) is listed at $0. QuillBot has a free option, and its first paid plan (Premium monthly) is listed at $19.95/month. Prices are from each company's pricing page and can change, so check before you buy.

Which has a free plan, LanguageTool vs QuillBot?

All of them. LanguageTool: 2,000 characters per text field, basic checking, and three AI sentence rephrasings per day. QuillBot: Limited paraphrasing and grammar access; several other tools remain available with tool-specific limits.

Can I self-host or integrate LanguageTool vs QuillBot?

LanguageTool is open source. LanguageTool can run on your own servers. LanguageTool offers a public API.

How much does LanguageTool cost?

LanguageTool has a free Basic plan. Paid Premium and Teams prices vary by locale, VAT, and billing cycle. A March 24, 2026 help page lists Premium at €19.90 monthly, €39.90 quarterly, €59.89 yearly, or €99.90 for two years. Teams are listed at €56.90 per user annually. Checkout may differ by country.

Is LanguageTool free?

Yes. Basic costs $0 and provides grammar and spelling checking, a 2,000-character limit per text field, and three AI sentence rephrasings per day. Users can access it through supported browsers and word processors. Premium is required for larger fields, advanced checks, personal style guides, and unlimited AI sentence paraphrasing.

How much does QuillBot cost?

QuillBot’s published Premium FAQ lists $19.95 for monthly billing, $39.95 billed every three months, and $99.95 billed annually. The annual figure is presented as $8.33 per month, while the quarterly figure is presented as $13.31 per month. Prices can vary by region and currency, so customers should confirm checkout details.

Is QuillBot free?

Yes. QuillBot offers free access with limited paraphrasing and grammar usage, while several other tools remain available with their own limits. The published FAQ identifies the citation generator, AI detection tool, and online translator as free, and says the grammar checker and paraphraser also have free access. Premium adds expanded modes, inputs, and reports.

Related comparisons

Sources