Jan vs Open WebUI: pricing, features and which to choose

Plans, prices, deployment options, strengths and limits for Jan vs Open WebUI, taken from each company's pricing page, docs and changelog. Updated October 2026.

JanOpen WebUI
Jan logo

Jan

Local & Self-Hosted AI

Jan is a free, open-source desktop AI assistant for local model inference, private chat data, and optional remote providers. Menlo Research publishes versions for macOS, Windows, and Linux, plus an OpenAI-compatible local server. The entry price is $0, excluding remote provider charges and model-related costs.

Open WebUI logo

Open WebUI

Local & Self-Hosted AI

Open WebUI is a self-hosted browser interface for Ollama and OpenAI-compatible services. It suits individuals, homelabs, and teams that want chat, files, tools, knowledge bases, and multiple model backends under their control. The standard deployment costs $0, while infrastructure, provider usage, and enterprise branding licenses can add separate costs.

Quick comparison

FeatureJanOpen WebUI
CategoryLocal & Self-Hosted AILocal & Self-Hosted AI
Main useLocal AI assistantSelf-hosted AI hub
Pricing modelFreeFree
Free plan Yes Yes
Entry paid plan$0 (Jan Desktop)$0 (Self-hosted standard)
PlatformsDesktopWeb and Docker
Open source Yes No
Self-hosted Yes Yes
Public API Yes Yes
Profile updatedOctober 2026October 2026

Pricing plans

Every public plan, as listed on each company's pricing page.

Jan

  • Jan Desktop$0

    The application, local server, local model usage, and listed desktop features are free. Remote providers charge separately, and local models require compatible hardware and storage.

Open WebUI

  • Self-hosted standard$0

    Free for internal use with original Open WebUI branding. Infrastructure, storage, local hardware, and connected provider charges are separate.

  • Enterprise licenseCustom

    Required for white-labeling, rebranding, altered branding, or enterprise offerings. The public enterprise pages do not list a fixed price.

Strengths and limits

Jan

  • Jan runs local models offline and stores local conversations on the computer.
  • The desktop app supports macOS, Windows, and Linux.
  • Its local server exposes an OpenAI-compatible API at localhost:1337.
  • Users can import GGUF files and connect several remote model providers.
  • Local response speed and model size depend heavily on the user's hardware.
  • Remote model usage follows each provider's privacy policy and billing.
  • Jan does not publish subscription tiers or centralized enterprise controls.

Open WebUI

  • It connects local Ollama models and OpenAI-compatible APIs.
  • The interface includes files, tools, knowledge bases, and administration.
  • The standard internally branded deployment costs $0.
  • Recent releases add collaboration and security controls.
  • Operators must secure, update, back up, and monitor deployments.
  • Cloud-model and integration charges sit outside the software price.
  • Later releases restrict branding changes above 50 users.

Which should you choose?

Choose Jan if

  • People who want private conversations with local language models.
  • Developers needing an OpenAI-compatible API on their own computer.
  • Users who want to switch between local models and remote providers.
  • Teams evaluating open-source desktop AI software and MCP integrations.

Look elsewhere if

  • Users without enough RAM, storage, or graphics capability for local models.
  • People who want a fully hosted assistant without downloading model files.
  • Organizations seeking a published enterprise pricing plan and centralized administration.

Choose Open WebUI if

  • Teams operating a private browser AI workspace.
  • Homelab users combining Ollama with hosted APIs.
  • Administrators needing model, file, and permission controls.
  • Organizations able to manage servers, updates, and storage.

Look elsewhere if

  • People seeking a turnkey hosted chatbot subscription.
  • Deployments requiring unrestricted rebranding at no license cost.
  • Users unwilling to administer servers and model providers.

Jan logo Jan in brief

Jan is a desktop AI assistant developed by Menlo Research, with its open-source repository created in August 2023. The project positions itself as an alternative to ChatGPT and Claude, running language models on a user's computer. Its website reports more than 4 million downloads, while another homepage rendering reports more than 6.5 million downloads, so the exact current total is inconsistent across Jan's pages. The project supports macOS, Windows, and Linux, and its repository lists Apache 2.0 licensing. Jan's current product surface includes desktop chat, local models, remote provider connections, projects, model management, MCP integrations, and a separate Jan Agent. It is aimed at people who want control over model choice, local files, and data location.

A typical Jan workflow begins by installing the desktop application, choosing a bundled or downloadable model, and opening a chat without an account. Users can download compatible GGUF models through Jan’s hub, import local GGUF files, or connect providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, and Groq with their own keys. Settings include context size, GPU layers, temperature, sampling controls, grammar files, and JSON schema files, helping users balance output behavior and hardware limits. Jan also supports custom assistants, file attachments, projects, MCP servers, and tool-enabled workflows. Its local server runs an OpenAI-compatible API at localhost:1337, so applications such as Continue and Cline can use local or configured remote models. This setup suits users who want desktop control, local files, and flexible provider choices.

Jan’s main limitation is that local performance depends on the computer, model size, quantization, available memory, and graphics support. Users should check hardware requirements and disk space before downloading large models. Ollama offers a more terminal-oriented model runner, while Jan adds a fuller desktop chat interface, model controls, projects, assistants, MCP integrations, and provider connections. LM Studio is a closer desktop comparison, with a polished local model catalog and server features, while Jan places more emphasis on open-source licensing and local data ownership. ChatGPT is easier for users who want a hosted service without model downloads, configuration, or hardware setup. Choose Jan for free local inference, an OpenAI-compatible local API, flexible model and provider selection, and control over where conversations are stored. Remote providers remain separately billed, while local use avoids Jan subscription charges.

Read the full Jan review

Open WebUI logo Open WebUI in brief

Open WebUI is a self-hosted AI interface created by Timothy J. Baek and maintained by Open WebUI, Inc. Its repository began in October 2023, and the project grew from an Ollama-focused interface into a browser front end for local and remote models. It can run offline or connect to OpenAI-compatible APIs, with deployment options including Docker, Kubernetes, Python, and bundled Ollama images. The software manages accounts, conversations, files, knowledge bases, tools, permissions, and administration, while optional features include image generation, speech, web search, and code execution. It does not include models or computing capacity, so operators select servers, storage, model runners, and external services. Open WebUI is recommended for teams and homelab users managing private AI infrastructure.

A typical Open WebUI installation uses Docker, Kubernetes, Python, or a bundled Ollama image, followed by a connection to Ollama or an OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Users select models, create conversations, attach files, search knowledge bases, and call configured tools. Administrators manage accounts, permissions, authentication, models, vector databases, document parsers, and integrations. Configured backends can add image generation, speech, web search, code execution, and external tool servers. This breadth suits teams and homelabs seeking one browser workspace for local and hosted models, but it creates more operational choices than a hosted chatbot. Operators remain responsible for servers, storage, backups, updates, and access controls. Response speed, model quality, retention, and data handling depend on selected infrastructure and connected services, making Open WebUI suitable for administrators running a private AI workspace.

Open WebUI offers more administration and collaboration features than a minimal Ollama front end, but operators remain responsible for security, updates, backups, storage, and provider configuration. Ollama is simpler for one person focused on running local models. LibreChat is a close alternative for a self-hosted interface connecting hosted providers, while AnythingLLM suits document-centered workspaces and retrieval. Open WebUI fits teams seeking one browser interface for Ollama and OpenAI-compatible APIs, with files, tools, knowledge bases, accounts, permissions, and model controls. Its standard internally branded deployment costs $0, though infrastructure, storage, hardware, and API charges remain separate. Buyers wanting a turnkey hosted chatbot, predictable all-in pricing, or unrestricted white-labeling should choose another product. It is recommended for teams able to manage servers, updates, and storage.

Read the full Open WebUI review

Frequently asked questions

How do Jan vs Open WebUI compare on price?

Jan has a free option, and its first paid plan (Jan Desktop) is listed at $0. Open WebUI has a free option, and its first paid plan (Self-hosted standard) is listed at $0. Prices are from each company's pricing page and can change, so check before you buy.

Which has a free plan, Jan vs Open WebUI?

All of them. Jan: The application, local server, local model usage, and listed desktop features are free. Remote providers charge separately, and local models require compatible hardware and storage. Open WebUI: Free for internal use with original Open WebUI branding. Infrastructure, storage, local hardware, and connected provider charges are separate.

Can I self-host or integrate Jan vs Open WebUI?

Jan is open source. Jan and Open WebUI can run on your own servers. Jan and Open WebUI offer a public API.

How much does Jan cost?

Jan's desktop application is free, including its local server and local model usage. Jan does not publish a paid subscription tier. You may still incur costs for remote providers connected through the app, such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, or Groq. Those providers set their own prices, and Jan states that it does not add a markup.

Does Jan have a free plan?

Yes. Jan describes the application as free and open source. The free product includes local model use after a model has been downloaded, the local server, and the desktop features listed by Jan. Local use requires suitable hardware, memory, and storage. Cloud model connections are separate and use the billing and privacy terms of the selected provider.

How much does Open WebUI cost?

The standard self-hosted deployment costs $0 for internal use with original Open WebUI branding. Operators still pay for hosting, storage, backups, local hardware, and connected API providers. Open WebUI lists enterprise licensing as custom priced for white-labeling, branding changes, and enterprise offerings, rather than publishing a fixed monthly rate.

Is Open WebUI free for a team?

The enterprise page lists internal use with original branding as free. The license permits branding changes for deployments with 50 or fewer end users during a rolling 30-day period. Larger deployments must retain Open WebUI branding unless they qualify for another license exception or purchase an enterprise license. Infrastructure and model-provider charges remain separate.

Related comparisons

Sources