Jan vs Ollama: pricing, features and which to choose

Plans, prices, deployment options, strengths and limits for Jan vs Ollama, taken from each company's pricing page, docs and changelog. Updated October 2026.

JanOllama
Jan logo

Jan

Local & Self-Hosted AI

Jan is a free, open-source desktop AI assistant for local model inference, private chat data, and optional remote providers. Menlo Research publishes versions for macOS, Windows, and Linux, plus an OpenAI-compatible local server. The entry price is $0, excluding remote provider charges and model-related costs.

Ollama logo

Ollama

Local & Self-Hosted AI

Ollama is a local AI runtime and developer API for running open models on macOS, Windows, Linux, Docker, and supported applications. It fits developers and privacy-conscious users with suitable hardware. Local use costs $0, while cloud access starts with a $0 plan, paid plans start at $20/month, and usage credits are available separately.

Quick comparison

FeatureJanOllama
CategoryLocal & Self-Hosted AILocal & Self-Hosted AI
Main useLocal AI assistantLocal AI runtime
Pricing modelFreeFree plan + paid tiers
Free plan Yes Yes
Entry paid plan$0 (Jan Desktop)$20/month (Pro)
PlatformsDesktopDesktop & API
Open source Yes Yes
Self-hosted Yes Yes
Public API Yes Yes
Profile updatedOctober 2026October 2026

Pricing plans

Every public plan, as listed on each company's pricing page.

Jan

  • Jan Desktop$0

    The application, local server, local model usage, and listed desktop features are free. Remote providers charge separately, and local models require compatible hardware and storage.

Ollama

  • Free$0

    Local runs are unlimited. Includes starter cloud credits, starter models, and 1 concurrent request; additional credits are pay as you go.

  • Pro$20/month

    Includes $60 of monthly cloud usage credits and 3 concurrent requests. Annual billing costs $200 per year.

  • Max$100/month

    Includes $300 of monthly cloud usage credits and 10 concurrent requests.

  • Team$500/month

    Includes $1,000 of shared monthly cloud usage credits, unlimited users, centralized billing, and administration.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Adds model access controls, budgets for users and API keys, a private Slack channel, and custom security questionnaires.

Strengths and limits

Jan

  • Jan runs local models offline and stores local conversations on the computer.
  • The desktop app supports macOS, Windows, and Linux.
  • Its local server exposes an OpenAI-compatible API at localhost:1337.
  • Users can import GGUF files and connect several remote model providers.
  • Local response speed and model size depend heavily on the user's hardware.
  • Remote model usage follows each provider's privacy policy and billing.
  • Jan does not publish subscription tiers or centralized enterprise controls.

Ollama

  • Local runs keep prompts and responses on the user's machine.
  • The REST API and official Python and JavaScript libraries support application development.
  • The CLI launches Claude Code, Codex, Copilot CLI, and OpenCode integrations.
  • Cloud plans extend the interface to larger hosted models.
  • Local speed depends heavily on available memory, model size, and GPU hardware.
  • Cloud access adds credits, concurrency limits, API keys, and token charges.
  • The primary interface is less consumer-oriented than dedicated chat applications.

Which should you choose?

Choose Jan if

  • People who want private conversations with local language models.
  • Developers needing an OpenAI-compatible API on their own computer.
  • Users who want to switch between local models and remote providers.
  • Teams evaluating open-source desktop AI software and MCP integrations.

Look elsewhere if

  • Users without enough RAM, storage, or graphics capability for local models.
  • People who want a fully hosted assistant without downloading model files.
  • Organizations seeking a published enterprise pricing plan and centralized administration.

Choose Ollama if

  • Developers building applications around local open models.
  • Users who want prompts and responses to remain on their hardware.
  • Teams that need one interface for local and hosted model runs.
  • Coding workflows that connect terminal agents to open models.

Look elsewhere if

  • Users who want a polished chat service without installation or configuration.
  • Teams expecting fast local inference on computers with limited memory or graphics hardware.
  • Organizations requiring extensive vendor-managed governance controls.

Jan logo Jan in brief

Jan is a desktop AI assistant developed by Menlo Research, with its open-source repository created in August 2023. The project positions itself as an alternative to ChatGPT and Claude, running language models on a user's computer. Its website reports more than 4 million downloads, while another homepage rendering reports more than 6.5 million downloads, so the exact current total is inconsistent across Jan's pages. The project supports macOS, Windows, and Linux, and its repository lists Apache 2.0 licensing. Jan's current product surface includes desktop chat, local models, remote provider connections, projects, model management, MCP integrations, and a separate Jan Agent. It is aimed at people who want control over model choice, local files, and data location.

A typical Jan workflow begins by installing the desktop application, choosing a bundled or downloadable model, and opening a chat without an account. Users can download compatible GGUF models through Jan’s hub, import local GGUF files, or connect providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, and Groq with their own keys. Settings include context size, GPU layers, temperature, sampling controls, grammar files, and JSON schema files, helping users balance output behavior and hardware limits. Jan also supports custom assistants, file attachments, projects, MCP servers, and tool-enabled workflows. Its local server runs an OpenAI-compatible API at localhost:1337, so applications such as Continue and Cline can use local or configured remote models. This setup suits users who want desktop control, local files, and flexible provider choices.

Jan’s main limitation is that local performance depends on the computer, model size, quantization, available memory, and graphics support. Users should check hardware requirements and disk space before downloading large models. Ollama offers a more terminal-oriented model runner, while Jan adds a fuller desktop chat interface, model controls, projects, assistants, MCP integrations, and provider connections. LM Studio is a closer desktop comparison, with a polished local model catalog and server features, while Jan places more emphasis on open-source licensing and local data ownership. ChatGPT is easier for users who want a hosted service without model downloads, configuration, or hardware setup. Choose Jan for free local inference, an OpenAI-compatible local API, flexible model and provider selection, and control over where conversations are stored. Remote providers remain separately billed, while local use avoids Jan subscription charges.

Read the full Jan review

Ollama logo Ollama in brief

Ollama is an AI runtime maintained by Ollama Inc. for downloading, serving, and integrating open models on personal computers and servers. Its repository was created on June 26, 2023, and uses the MIT License. Ollama documents support for macOS, Windows, Linux, Docker, Python, and JavaScript, with a REST API for model management and chat. The company reports more than 9 million monthly installs, more than 1 billion model downloads, and more than 200 trillion tokens served. Those figures come from Ollama's homepage. Local runs keep prompts and responses on the user's machine, while Ollama Cloud provides hosted inference for models that exceed local hardware capacity. This combination makes the product relevant to developers who want a local runtime with an optional hosted path.

A typical workflow begins by installing Ollama on macOS, Windows, or Linux, then running a model such as Gemma 4 with the command line. Users can chat in a terminal, launch supported coding integrations with commands such as ollama launch claude, or call the local REST API at port 11434. The official Python and JavaScript libraries support application development, and Ollama documents OpenAI-compatible and Anthropic-compatible clients for cloud API access. A Modelfile defines a customized model configuration, while commands manage downloading, listing, copying, and removing models. Cloud models use the same general interface, but require sign-in when accessed through the app or CLI. Direct cloud API requests use an API key and do not require an Ollama installation.

Hardware is Ollama's main local constraint. Large models can require substantial memory and may run slowly on computers without a strong GPU, while cloud use adds sign-in, API-key, quota, concurrency, and token-cost considerations. LM Studio is a closer choice for users who prefer a graphical desktop interface for downloading and chatting with local models. Jan is another local-first runner with an application-oriented interface. GPT4All also focuses on running models locally. Open WebUI is a separate self-hosted interface that connects to Ollama rather than replacing its runtime and API. Choose Ollama if you want a command-line and API layer for local open models, with optional cloud inference for larger models and integrations with coding tools.

Read the full Ollama review

Frequently asked questions

How do Jan vs Ollama compare on price?

Jan has a free option, and its first paid plan (Jan Desktop) is listed at $0. Ollama has a free option, and its first paid plan (Pro) is listed at $20/month. Prices are from each company's pricing page and can change, so check before you buy.

Which has a free plan, Jan vs Ollama?

All of them. Jan: The application, local server, local model usage, and listed desktop features are free. Remote providers charge separately, and local models require compatible hardware and storage. Ollama: Local runs are unlimited. Includes starter cloud credits, starter models, and 1 concurrent request; additional credits are pay as you go.

Can I self-host or integrate Jan vs Ollama?

Jan and Ollama are open source. Jan and Ollama can run on your own servers. Jan and Ollama offer a public API.

How much does Jan cost?

Jan's desktop application is free, including its local server and local model usage. Jan does not publish a paid subscription tier. You may still incur costs for remote providers connected through the app, such as OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, or Groq. Those providers set their own prices, and Jan states that it does not add a markup.

Does Jan have a free plan?

Yes. Jan describes the application as free and open source. The free product includes local model use after a model has been downloaded, the local server, and the desktop features listed by Jan. Local use requires suitable hardware, memory, and storage. Cloud model connections are separate and use the billing and privacy terms of the selected provider.

How much does Ollama cost?

Ollama's local software costs $0, and local runs are unlimited on your hardware. Cloud pricing includes Free at $0, Pro at $20 per month or $200 annually, Max at $100 per month, Team at $500 per month, and Enterprise at custom pricing. Cloud usage beyond included credits is charged at each model's input, cached-input, and output token rates.

Does Ollama have a free plan?

Yes. The Free plan costs $0 and includes local model runs, starter cloud credits, starter models, and one concurrent cloud request. Users can purchase additional credits to access all cloud models. Local inference does not consume cloud credits, and runs on the user's own hardware remain unlimited.

Related comparisons

Sources