Gumloop vs n8n: pricing, features and which to choose

Gumloop is a hosted agent and workflow builder made by AgentHub Inc., founded in April 2023 by McGill classmates Max Brodeur-Urbas and Rahul Behal under the name AgentHub. The company changed its name to Gumloop in 2024. BetaKit reported a $3.1 million seed round in July 2024, while TechCrunch and BetaKit reported a $17 million Series A in January 2025. The reported funding total reached about $20 million. Gumloop presents its product as a multiplayer AI agent builder for company operations. People create agents that connect to business applications, run from schedules or triggers, and produce reports, documents, dashboards, or web apps. The product is a commercial SaaS service rather than an open-source platform.

A typical Gumloop workflow starts on a visual canvas, where a user combines instructions, connectors, and reusable skills. Agents can read or write in Slack, Gmail, Salesforce, HubSpot, Notion, Linear, GitHub, and Google Sheets, with additional tools available through MCP. Users can run agents interactively, schedule them, call them with a webhook, or invoke them through the REST API. Gumloop also provides an MCP server for compatible clients. Documented use cases include lead enrichment, CRM updates, meeting briefs, support triage, monitoring, data analysis, research, and scheduled reports. Teams share usage through an organization credit pool. Developers can add logic through Python or JavaScript alongside visual workflow steps, while business users can build and revise agents without maintaining a separate orchestration service.

Gumloop fits business teams that want agents to act across existing SaaS tools without running orchestration infrastructure. Its usage pricing requires closer monitoring than fixed per-task plans, especially when agents use expensive models, many connectors, or long compute sessions. Compared with Zapier, Gumloop offers deeper agent behavior and MCP access. Compared with n8n, Gumloop is more managed and business-user oriented, while n8n offers greater deployment control. Compared with Dify, Gumloop focuses more on connected operational work than on building self-hosted RAG applications. Gumloop is less suitable for teams seeking broad self-hosting or predictable task pricing. Choose it for collaborative SaaS automation, API access, and enterprise governance, especially when the intended user is a business or IT team.

n8n is a workflow automation company founded by Jan Oberhauser in 2019. It says its platform had more than 200,000 users and 3,000 enterprises by March 2025, and announced a $180 million Series C in October 2025, bringing total funding to $240 million and valuation to $2.5 billion. Its canvas combines code, integrations, credentials, webhooks, schedules, and AI nodes. Cloud hosting is the easiest entry point, while Community Edition is free to self-host. Pricing is based on workflow executions rather than steps or users. Self-hosting gives developers control over infrastructure and workflow data, but requires responsibility for security, backups, execution data, community nodes, telemetry settings, and license compliance. n8n is best for technical teams that value self-hosting, execution-based pricing, and AI model choice.

A typical n8n workflow begins with a schedule, webhook, polling event, or application trigger. Nodes can transform data, call APIs, run code, route conditions, query an AI model, or send work for human review. Each complete automatic run counts as one production execution, regardless of node count, while manual editor tests are excluded. Features include templates, Data Tables, sub-workflows, credential connections, retries, execution inspection, and AI Agent nodes. In 2025, n8n added Evaluations, allowing builders to test inputs, compare outputs, and apply measures for correctness, toxicity, bias, or tool choice. Users can connect multiple model providers according to cost and data needs. This workflow approach suits technical teams seeking execution-based pricing, self-hosting, and model choice.

n8n’s main tradeoff is operational and legal complexity. Self-hosting keeps workflow data on your infrastructure, but administrators must secure servers, manage backups, prune execution data, review community nodes, and configure telemetry settings. Its Sustainable Use License allows internal business use and consulting, but prohibits selling hosted n8n or exposing workflow building to customers without a commercial agreement. Zapier is easier for nontechnical users, Make offers a polished visual alternative, and Pipedream is stronger for code-first integrations. n8n’s execution-based billing can suit teams with many-node workflows, while its provider flexibility supports different cost and data requirements. Choose n8n when self-hosting, model choice, and infrastructure control matter more than a beginner-first interface, especially for technical teams and AI workflow builders.