Microsoft Foundry vs Groq: pricing, features and which to choose

Plans, prices, deployment options, strengths and limits for Microsoft Foundry vs Groq, taken from each company's pricing page, docs and changelog. Updated October 2026.

Microsoft FoundryGroq
Microsoft Foundry logo

Microsoft Foundry

Coding AI Tools

Microsoft Foundry, formerly Azure AI Foundry, is Microsoft's Azure platform for building AI apps and agents. It offers more than 11,000 models, including OpenAI's GPT family and Anthropic's Claude, plus Foundry Agent Service, Foundry IQ for grounding, tools through MCP, evaluations and governance. You pay for model tokens and Azure resources, and creating prompt-based agents carries no extra charge.

Groq logo

Groq

Coding AI Tools

Groq operates GroqCloud, an inference service with an OpenAI-compatible API, hosted open models, speech recognition, text to speech, compound tools, and batch processing. A free plan supports building and testing. Developer usage is pay as you go, with listed language-model prices starting at $0.075 per million input tokens for GPT OSS 20B.

Quick comparison

FeatureMicrosoft FoundryGroq
CategoryCoding AI ToolsCoding AI Tools
Main useAI agent platformFast model inference
Pricing modelPay per usePay per use
Free plan Yes Yes
Entry paid planPer token (Foundry Models)$0 (Free)
PlatformsAzure cloudWeb & API
Open source No No
Self-hosted No No
Public API Yes Yes
Profile updatedOctober 2026October 2026

Pricing plans

Every public plan, as listed on each company's pricing page.

Microsoft Foundry

  • Foundry ModelsPer token

    Rates vary by model and deployment; GPT-6.1 Sol $2 in, $10 out per 1M.

  • Foundry Agent Service$0 platform fee

    Prompt agents free to create and run; pay for tokens and tools.

  • Hosted agentsPer container hour

    Agents built with open source frameworks on managed compute.

  • Provisioned throughputPTU reservations

    Reserved capacity for steady, high-volume workloads.

Groq

  • Free$0

    Build and test APIs with community support; rate limits apply.

  • DeveloperPay per token or audio unit

    From $0.075 per million input tokens; output tokens and audio incur separate listed charges.

  • EnterpriseCustom

    Scalable capacity, dedicated support, LoRA inference, SSO, SCIM, and 90-day audit logs.

Strengths and limits

Microsoft Foundry

  • More than 11,000 models listed.
  • OpenAI and Claude models on one platform.
  • No platform fee for prompt agents.
  • Entra, Defender and Microsoft 365 integration.
  • Azure portal and quotas are complex.
  • Frequent product renames confuse docs.
  • Prices vary by region and deployment.

Groq

  • The API uses familiar OpenAI-compatible chat-completion patterns.
  • The model directory publishes token, audio, context, and rate information.
  • Free access lets developers test before enabling usage billing.
  • Developer adds batch, Flex, spend controls, and higher limits.
  • Model availability and prices can change as preview models are retired.
  • Free and Developer rate limits can constrain bursty production traffic.
  • Enterprise pricing and some production model prices require sales contact.

Which should you choose?

Choose Microsoft Foundry if

  • Organizations standardized on Azure.
  • Teams wanting GPT and Claude in one place.
  • Agents published to Teams and Microsoft 365.
  • Enterprises with strict data residency rules.

Look elsewhere if

  • Developers outside the Azure cloud.
  • Hobbyists wanting a simple API key.
  • Teams wanting predictable flat pricing.

Choose Groq if

  • It suits developers migrating OpenAI-compatible applications to fast hosted open-model inference.
  • It suits voice products needing hosted Whisper transcription at usage-based rates.
  • It suits teams that need token-level billing rather than a large fixed subscription.
  • It suits latency-sensitive prototypes that can work within hosted-model availability.

Look elsewhere if

  • It is not a full replacement for a general-purpose hyperscale cloud platform.
  • It is not suitable when every workload must run inside your own infrastructure.
  • It is not ideal when a proprietary model or broad managed data stack is mandatory.

Microsoft Foundry logo Microsoft Foundry in brief

Microsoft Foundry is the successor to Azure AI Studio and Azure AI Foundry, and Microsoft calls it its AI app and agent factory. It serves developers and enterprises building on Azure, especially companies that already use Microsoft 365, Entra ID, Fabric and Azure security tools. The portal at ai.azure.com, SDKs and a Visual Studio Code extension cover the full cycle: choose a model, ground it in company data, build an agent, evaluate it and monitor it in production. Because it runs inside Azure subscriptions, usage counts toward existing Azure commitments, and Microsoft's regional and data zone deployments help with data residency requirements in the US, Europe and Asia Pacific.

Foundry Models gives access to more than 11,000 models, according to Microsoft's pricing page. That includes OpenAI models, which Microsoft hosts on Azure, such as the GPT-6 family that reached general availability in September 2026, plus Microsoft's own MAI models, Meta's Llama, Mistral, DeepSeek, xAI's Grok and many open models from Hugging Face. Since November 2025 Anthropic's Claude models have also been available in Foundry, which Microsoft says made Azure the only cloud offering both Claude and GPT frontier models. Teams can benchmark models side by side, use a model router that picks a model per request and fine-tune or distill models through Azure Machine Learning.

Microsoft Foundry's strengths are the largest model catalog among the big clouds, first-party hosting of OpenAI models, Claude and GPT on one platform, deep Microsoft 365 and Entra integration, and agent tooling with MCP and governance built in. Its weaknesses are Azure complexity, frequent renaming that confuses documentation, pricing that changes by region and deployment type, and quotas that can limit access to new models. Amazon Bedrock is the AWS counterpart. Google Vertex AI leads with Gemini on Google Cloud. Microsoft Copilot Studio offers low-code agents for business users. Hugging Face hosts open models. Choose Foundry if your organization runs on Azure and Microsoft 365.

Read the full Microsoft Foundry review

Groq logo Groq in brief

Groq is an AI infrastructure company founded in 2016 by Jonathan Ross, a former Google TPU architect. Its product focus is inference rather than general cloud computing: GroqCloud gives developers hosted access to language, speech recognition, text to speech, and tool-enabled models. Groq says its LPU architecture is designed for predictable, fast token generation. The company announced a $650 million financing round in June 2026 and said it planned to expand its infrastructure toward 200 MW by the end of 2027. In December 2025, Groq licensed inference technology to NVIDIA while retaining an independent company and operating cloud service. That distinction matters for customers evaluating continuity, corporate control, and the relationship between the licensed technology and the customer-facing cloud.

A typical Groq workflow starts in the developer console, where a user creates an API key and selects a hosted model. The API follows OpenAI-style chat-completions conventions, so existing applications can often change the endpoint and model identifier rather than redesign their request layer. Developers can list models through the models endpoint, stream responses, request structured output on supported models, and use SDKs including Python and JavaScript. Groq also hosts Whisper variants for transcription, Orpheus models for speech generation, and compound systems that call tools such as web search or code execution. Batch processing handles asynchronous workloads, while Flex processing offers a different cost and latency tradeoff for suitable jobs and traffic patterns.

Groq fits teams seeking low response latency, an OpenAI-compatible migration path, and usage-priced access to open models. Its narrower focus can simplify inference deployments and rapid prototypes, especially when applications stream responses or process many short requests. It is less suitable for projects needing a broad managed cloud platform, guaranteed access to every newest model, or local deployment of the hosted service. Alternatives include Together AI, Fireworks AI, Cerebras Inference, Replicate, and AWS Bedrock. Compared with general cloud platforms, Groq concentrates more on inference speed and model serving, while offering fewer integrated services for storage, networking, identity, and regional administration. Compared with Cerebras, it provides a broader current model catalog, although both emphasize fast generation. Choose Groq when latency and straightforward migration matter; choose a larger cloud when integrated infrastructure controls matter more.

Read the full Groq review

Frequently asked questions

How do Microsoft Foundry vs Groq compare on price?

Microsoft Foundry has a free option, and its first paid plan (Foundry Models) is listed at Per token. Groq has a free option, and its first paid plan (Free) is listed at $0. Prices are from each company's pricing page and can change, so check before you buy.

Which has a free plan, Microsoft Foundry vs Groq?

All of them. Microsoft Foundry: Prompt agents free to create and run; pay for tokens and tools. Groq: Build and test APIs with community support; rate limits apply.

Can I self-host or integrate Microsoft Foundry vs Groq?

None of them is open source. All of them run as hosted services only. Microsoft Foundry and Groq offer a public API.

Is Azure AI Foundry the same as Microsoft Foundry?

Yes. Microsoft renamed Azure AI Studio to Azure AI Foundry and then to Microsoft Foundry. The portal remains at ai.azure.com, and older documentation, SDK names and blog posts still use the earlier names. The platform covers Foundry Models, Foundry Agent Service, Foundry IQ, Foundry Tools and Foundry Control Plane.

How much does Microsoft Foundry cost?

There is no platform subscription. You pay for model tokens, tools and Azure resources. Microsoft says creating and running prompt-based agents in Foundry Agent Service has no extra charge beyond those costs. Hosted agents bill per container hour, and provisioned throughput units reserve capacity for high-volume workloads.

How much does Groq cost?

Groq has a free plan for building and testing. Developer usage is billed as you use the API, by tokens for language models and by audio duration for transcription. Listed examples include $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens for GPT OSS 20B, plus $0.04 per audio hour for Whisper Large v3 Turbo.

Does Groq have a free plan?

Yes. The Free plan costs $0 and is intended for building and testing with community support. It has rate limits, and the exact limits depend on the model and account. Developer raises capacity and adds features such as batch processing, Flex service, spend limits, chat support, and audit logs, while retaining usage-based billing.

Related comparisons

Sources